On 12/21/2013 5:30 AM, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
Hi Ognjen,
2013/12/20 Ognjen Blagojevic <ognjen.d.blagoje...@gmail.com>
Violeta,
On 20.12.2013 13:52, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
The proposed 7.0.50 release is:
[X] Broken - do not release
Thanks for the testing.
I'm still not convinced to stop the voting based on the frequency (1/5000)
of the problem.
Equally important as the frequency of reproduction:
Is this a regression from the last release?
In other words, can no such issue be produced with 7.0.47?
If not, then I don't see a reason to hold off on other fixes in 7.0.50.
If it appears to be a regression, however, /then /there's an argument to
take this more seriously.
--
Jess Holle
