e.org/migration.html
>
>
> I, personally, think that it would be better to move the classes to
> their old place.
>
> I think that Servlet 3.0 applications would prefer Servlet Async API,
The Async stuff doesn't cover all the stuff Comet could do.
TOP); // What to do
>> with return code ?
>>
> What you want to do here, is let the Endpoint know that stop is called.
Yep.
> The end point will then dispatch a new thread to handle the request
Some more logic is missing in
ome.
>
> Note the links won't work until we actually do the release.
+1
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
new things" list. There are
>> some sexy features there, beyond the internal changes.
http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/mrel/jsr245/index.html is a
better link for EL and JSP, no?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
ty manager - pass
I am still working on a better fix for this one... Probably for RC3.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
issues were noted:
> - Reload is broken (fixed)
> - Mapper registration is a mess (fixed)
> - Jean-Frederic reports that my APR/native solution is a hack and that
> he has a better fix on the way
>
> Given that rolling a release only takes a few minutes, I'm happy to roll
> an
On 05/19/2010 02:25 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> [X] +1 Move them.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
On 05/19/2010 12:09 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> On 05/19/2010 11:40 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 17/05/2010 20:11, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> The 7.0.0-RC2 tag is
>>> [ ] Broken - do not release
>>> [X] Alpha - go ahead and release 7.0.0 Alpha based on 7.0
On 05/20/2010 11:10 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 20/05/2010 07:55, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> The TC tests are crashing the JVM with and without my patch. Should I
>> commit the patch anyway?
>
> The TCK tests?
No: in the TC tests: ant tests.
The problem is located in Apr
On 05/21/2010 04:41 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> We found a few issues in RC2 so I'm going to create RC3. Before I do,
> are there any other issues in RC2 that need fixing? If no-one speaks up
> I'll roll RC3 over the weekend.
+1
Ch
be one issue breaking subsequent tests
>
> [1] has been thay way for numerous stable 6.0.x releases, [3] can be
> worked around by not using APR/native
hm according to your mail AJP is always failing, no?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
AJP APR is still missing I will work on it.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Hi,
What about putting back the original tomcat logo? (The 10th one is there
since 2009-10-23).
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
Tag on Monday, packaging , votes
and release before the next week-end, is that ok?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Hi,
I plan to tag 6.0.27 on Monday (European morning) and start the release
process.
Comments?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
mmons-logging/log4j juli package.
hm not really sure what is wrong. That is not regression what do you
except there?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.27/
According to the release process, the 6.0.27 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_6_0_27 is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
t;> socket, it seems SSL_set_bio is never called, can't figure what
>> SSLContext.setBIO() does.
>>
>
> I'd suggest you forget about those ;)
>
> SSL BIO allows to write a java code that will SSL use
> for read/write to the sockets.
> Jean-Frederic crea
On 06/16/2010 07:44 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:14 PM, jean-frederic clere
> wrote:
>
>> On 06/16/2010 07:08 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
>>> On 06/16/2010 12:34 AM, Costin Manolache wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Ther
On 06/17/2010 04:30 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 12:56 AM, jean-frederic clere <mailto:jfcl...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> On 06/16/2010 07:44 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:14 PM, jean-frederic clere
eptorThread.start();
> }
> +
> +// Start async timeout thread
> +Thread timeoutThread = new Thread(new AsyncTimeout(), getName()
> + "-AsyncTimeout");
> +timeoutThread.start();
> }
> }
-
/v6.0.28/
According to the release process, the 6.0.28 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_6_0_28 is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
+++
Comments?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
On 06/30/2010 05:20 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2010/6/29 jean-frederic clere :
>> Due to bugs (49445 and 49424) and as I was not able to finish the
>> release process quickly (because of working remotely) and as releases
>> are cheap we would like to abandon 6.0.27 and
On 07/01/2010 09:28 AM, Marc Guillemot wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> nice to see some activity on this thread.
>
>> If you were following the dev list you would have seen that
>> Jean-Frederic has already vetoed the change Peter made on the basis
>> that it breaks the T
t for an
> open source test suite.
I think that patch is wrong... According to my tests the thread is
created but the timeout doesn't happen... I need more time to come with
another patch.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
>
> Cheers,
> Marc.
---
nding to the
> tag TOMCAT_5_5_30 [1] is:
>
> [ ] Broken
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [X] Stable
According to my quick tests :D
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
Fo
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat 6.0.28 stable. This release includes bug-fixes over Apache
Tomcat 6.0.26.
Apache Tomcat 6.0 includes new features over Apache Tomcat 5.5,
including support for the new Servlet 2.5 and JSP 2.1 specifications, a
refactored
On 07/09/2010 05:20 PM, Marc Guillemot wrote:
> Hi Jean-Frédéric,
>
> why does http://www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-6/ always say:
>
> "Current stable version is 6.0.26"
Should be OK soon.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
---
On 06/14/2010 06:19 PM, Peter Roßbach wrote:
> Hi Jean-Frederic,
>
> only the last 6.0.26 release has a wrong normal juli.jar. Can you
> correct this? Please, made a check after
> tomcat 6.0.27 maven publish.
I think it should be ok in 6.0.28.
Cheers
ustomers on 6.0.28.
>
> I have a test case and am working on this now.
Ok cool I am OK to release starting next week (Monday?), if you are fast
in voting and we don't add too many new patches during the week-end.
Che
On 07/16/2010 01:15 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 16.07.2010 12:30, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 16/07/2010 08:20, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>>> On 07/15/2010 11:10 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>>> Folks,
>>>>
>>>> It looks like we have a regression in
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.29/
According to the release process, the 6.0.29 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_6_0_29 is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
the runnable always trigger.
>
>>From the top of page 14 of the servlet 3.0 spec:
>
> AsyncContext.setTimeout(long)... A value of 0 or less indicates that the
> asynchronous operation will never time out. ...
>
> I couldn't find an explicit default.
Can't find it too.. Why not using 0 (for ever) or 1 minutes (to prevent
bad applications).
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
On 07/19/2010 06:33 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> The candidates binaries are available here:
> http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.29/
>
> According to the release process, the 6.0.29 build corresponding to the
> tag TOMCAT_6_0_29 is:
> [ ] Broken
> [ ]
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat 6.0.29 stable. This release includes bug-fixes over Apache
Tomcat 6.0.28.
Apache Tomcat 6.0 includes new features over Apache Tomcat 5.5,
including support for the new Servlet 2.5 and JSP 2.1 specifications, a
refactored
ter doesn't work?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
quire something newer than APR
> 1.3.
It seems you need 1.4.x for apr_pollset_wakeup() but why do we need
apr_pollset_wakeup()?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
trunk/native/src/jnilib.c Tue Aug 24 13:33:18 2010
> @@ -65,9 +65,16 @@ JNIEXPORT jint JNICALL JNI_OnLoad(JavaVM
> apr_version(&apv);
> apvn = apv.major * 1000 + apv.minor * 100 + apv.patch;
> if (apvn < 1400) {
> +#if defined(HAVE_POOL_PRE_CLEANUP) && defined(HAVE_POLLSE
On 08/24/2010 04:07 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> On 08/24/2010 03:33 PM, mt...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: mturk
>> Date: Tue Aug 24 13:33:18 2010
>> New Revision: 988537
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=988537&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Al
On 08/24/2010 04:30 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 08/24/2010 04:07 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> On 08/24/2010 03:33 PM, mt...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: mturk
>>> Date: Tue Aug 24 13:33:18 2010
>>> New Revision: 988537
>>>
>>> URL: ht
most places the version property is used
> (which is set to 6.0.29).
>
> Just something to keep in mind when we start thinking about timing for
> 6.0.30.
+1
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr.
register
if you are around Atlanta and want to join us.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Any testing ?
>
> Another question: is it safe on all platforms to concurrently read
> uramdom from a single process ? I suppose it is probably safe, but do we
> know for sure ?
For info: http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/11/27/113
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
che-tomcat-7.0.5-src/output/testclasses
[javac] Compiling 122 source files to
/home/hudson/TMP/apache-tomcat-7.0.5-src/output/testclasses
[javac]
/home/hudson/TMP/apache-tomcat-7.0.5-src/test/org/apache/catalina/startup/TomcatBaseTest.java:34:
package junit.framework does not exist
On 11/30/2010 09:55 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 30/11/2010 08:17, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> Something looks broken (that is not new I think).
>
> Yes, but it is your test environment ;)
Yes I had a build.properties with
junit.home=${user.home}/java/junit3.8.1 probably for a o
?!
>>
>> I'm sure you automted all tests :-P
>
> I did, but it's still agonizing waiting for it to complete.
> Jean-Frederic threatened to see if they could provide some resources to
> re-run these tests on more reasonable hard
On 01/04/2011 11:44 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
It has been a while since 6.0.29 and there have been a few requests for
this on the users list. Jean-Frederic, do you have any plans for 6.0.30
at this point?
Next week :D
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
On 01/04/2011 07:04 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2011/1/4 jean-frederic clere:
On 01/04/2011 11:44 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
It has been a while since 6.0.29 and there have been a few requests for
this on the users list. Jean-Frederic, do you have any plans for 6.0.30
at this point?
Next week
Hi,
I plan to tag TOMCAT_NATIVE_1_1_21 to release it later, is that OK?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Hi,
I plan to tag 6.0.30 on Monday, please complain if you disagree.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.30/
According to the release process, the 6.0.30 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_6_0_30 is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
According to the results 6.0.30 is going to be released as STABLE.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat 6.0.30 stable. This release includes bug-fixes over Apache
Tomcat 6.0.29.
Note that is version has 4 zip binaries: a generic one and three
bundled with Tomcat native binaries for different CPU architectures.
Apache Tomc
On 01/17/2011 03:02 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'd like to look over the remaining STATUS of 5.5 in hopes of
getting a 5.5.32 out soon... I'll RM.
Comments?
+1
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: de
On 01/20/2011 05:09 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
The memory leak in the Tomcat 7 NIO connector [1] got back-ported to
6.0.x and included in 6.0.30. [2]
I have proposed the fix for 6.0.x. Given the severity I think we need to
approve the backport and start a 6.0.31 release asap.
+1
Cheers
Jean
Hi,
Due the regression in NIO we need a release, I plan to tag on Monday
afternoon my time, comments?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.31/
According to the release process, the 6.0.31 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_6_0_31 is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
ikely mess things up.
If we're ready to do this I'd suggest going for it this week.
Thoughts?
+1
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
On 01/27/2011 10:30 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2011/1/25 jean-frederic clere:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.31/
According to the release process, the 6.0.31 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_6_0_31 is:
[x] Beta
That is
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.32/
According to the release process, the 6.0.32 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_6_0_32 is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat 6.0.32 stable.
Apache Tomcat 6.0.32 is primarily a security and bug fix release. All
users of older versions of the Tomcat 6.0 family should upgrade to 6.0.32.
Note that is version has 4 zip binaries: a generic one a
sync unit test failures (Rainer?) that I
blamed on the APR/native code, I apologise. It was indeed all my fault.
Ok I will go for tc-native release now.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache
Hi,
Later today I will tag and go for the release, make sure all the patches
you want to see in are committed :-)
It will also add binaries for tc-native
Comments?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev
On 12/21/2009 09:20 PM, jfcl...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jfclere
Date: Mon Dec 21 20:20:02 2009
New Revision: 892964
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=892964&view=rev
Log:
my vote.
I have commit the corresponding thing. the remaining patch need more
work. I will tag now.
Cheers
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.21/
According to the release process, the 6.0.21 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e
ckaging is broken, not the 6.0.21 itself.
So nothing prevent from a release of 6.0.21 ?
I just have to redo the package and produce the missing tcnative-1.dlls.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: de
y could go into a release notes file.
1.1.17 is vulnerable to CVE-2009-3555, 1.1.18 prevents it at least for
the client initiated renegotiations.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
On 12/22/2009 10:32 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 22/12/2009 09:11, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 12/22/2009 09:28 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
Up till now we always had tcnative-1.dll not libtcnative-1.dll
so it's just broken build comming from private builds,
because there is no 1.1.18 binari
.
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
d, as
long as the return type of the deferred method signature is not
void is not enforced. This needs to be fixed for 6.0.21 and
will, therefore, require a re-tag.
Sure.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-uns
han a couple of minutes have passed since tagging). After
editing it's not any more a tag that uniquely describes one version of
the code, instead it becomes a branch.
Well probably that is also a good idea.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
---
v=893378&view=rev
+1: kkolinko
- -1:
+ -1: jfclere
+ missing append="true" and doesn't apply I am working on a better proposal.
append="true" is _not_ needed.
Yep in fact it doesn't apply and the format of the md5 files
On 12/23/2009 01:38 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 23/12/2009 08:55, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 12/22/2009 09:27 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Servlet TCK passes
JSP TCK passes - 1 failure
This one, however, can't be ignored. Remy hinted at it early today. The
fix for bug 47453 created a regressi
nough votes.
Merry Christmas
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
On 12/31/2009 01:57 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 23/12/2009 17:56, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> The candidates binaries are available here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.22/
>>
>> According to the release process, the 6.0.22 tag is:
>> [X
che.org.
>
> Should we go further and request deleting them from the
> archive.apache.org as well?
+1
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
>
> Best regards,
> Konstantin Kolinko
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: d
version 1.3.3 or newer installed.)
>> +else
>> + if test "${2}" -lt "3"; then
>> +AC_MSG_ERROR(You need APR version 1.3.3 or newer installed.)
>> + fi
>> fi
>> fi
>>
>
> I
s to apr-1.2.7 located in srclib.
What happens is that buildconf copies files from apr the idea was to
have that information in native/srclib/VERSIONS.
I think the file native/srclib/VERSIONS should be created by configure
and do
t;>
>> ( 1) "openssl.exe version" prints that number,
>>2) looking for "0.9.8" string inside the DLLs I see that number.)
>>
>> Wasn't it supposed to be 0.9.8l ?
>>
>
> Nope. 0.9.8l is broken, so we switched back to 0.9.8k
d (my stomach at least).
+1 I had some problems to get my remote macosx box to run but it is ok
on all the platforms I am able to test.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.or
wnloading
> deps is automated.
>
> Any comments on including the experimental SPDY support (
> http://www.chromium.org/spdy/spdy-protocol ) ?
> I know we had countless debates on JK2 and http proxies, but some extra code
> to
7;t hurt :-)
>>
>> We need a httpd module (like mod_proxy_ajp) for that :-)
>
> mod_proxy_spdy ? :-)
Yep that is my idea :-)
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Hi,
I plan to tag 6.0.23 tomorrow lunch time (~13h00 my time).
Please complain if that is not ok.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.23/
According to the release process, the 6.0.23 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To
On 01/14/2010 04:01 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> doco stuff you can go right ahead and change without status IIRC
I was about to do it but we have
http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/TomcatVersions that could replace it.
Should I use the link to the wiki?
Cheers
Jean-Frede
On 01/14/2010 04:51 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 14/01/2010 14:23, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> The candidates binaries are available here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.23/
>>
>> According to the release process, the 6.0.23 tag is:
>> [
lease some things which
is not TCK compliant.
Rollback r899138 should fix those TCK issues, no?
Cheeers
Jean-Frederic
>
> Filip
>
> On 01/14/2010 07:23 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> The candidates binaries are available here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/t
ilures. (the signature tests).
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
>
> Mark
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-ma
On 01/15/2010 10:33 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> According to my tests:
> EL : 11 failures. (They looks similar I will have a closer look later).
java/javax/el/ArrayELResolver.java setValue exceptions are missing (Look
in http://java.sun.com/javaee/6/docs/api/javax/el/ArrayELResolver.
Hi,
I plan to tag 6.0.24 tomorrow lunch time (~13h00 my time).
Please complain if that is not ok.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.24/
According to the release process, the 6.0.24 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To
p://tomcat.apache.org/native-doc/index.html
>
>
> A bit of a mess, but I think that the site from the branch is the right one.
>
> Probably we shouldn't maintain changelog-1.1.x.html [2] in the trunk,
> because it duplicates effort.
>
> I'll update the l
Hi,
We have 6 binding Stable votes.
I'll proceed with copying the files to
dist, updating the web pages and make an Announcement.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For addit
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat 6.0.24 stable. This release includes many bug-fixes over Apache
Tomcat 6.0.20.
Note that is version has 4 zip binaries: a generic one and three
bundled with Tomcat native binaries for different CPU architectures.
Apache
On 01/22/2010 07:01 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2010/1/21 Konstantin Kolinko :
>> 2010/1/21 Mark Thomas :
>>> On 21/01/2010 04:33, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> We have 6 binding Stable votes.
>>>> I'll
e.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
>
> I propose to backport this to 6.0 and 5.5 docs. Are there any complaints?
Cool +1
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apac
t the documented Apache m2-repository (for stable releases) only has up to
> 6.0.18:
>
> http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/m2-repository/org/apache/tomcat/catalina/
I have fixed the stuff in people.apache.org I hope it will appear soon
in the mirrors.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
>
> Than
It seems I have one in ant and it uses this one :-/
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
>
> --
> Jason
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists > wrote:
>
>> I get the error thrown by
>>
>> JSchException("Algorithm negotiation fail"
lready destroyed with apr_pool_terminate, and
> can lead to a JVM core.
>
> The fix is quite simple (r907567) and I plan to tag 1.1.20
> and propose a vote.
>
>
> Comments?
Cool :-)
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe,
in the "Not a vulnerability in Tomcat" part?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
401 - 500 of 813 matches
Mail list logo
