https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62626
--- Comment #18 from jan.pfei...@centrum.cz ---
(In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #16)
Its like observing black hole for me but i've came to some conslusions
>
> But why is it not crashing on Java 8?
1. I have tried org.apache.ca
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62650
Bug ID: 62650
Summary: ampersand entity in jspx
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Compone
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62459
--- Comment #14 from Rainer Jung ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #9)
> What you are asking for is logically impossible. If mod_jk sees the sequence
> "%2F" it has no way to determine if this is the result of decoding "%252F"
> or not
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62626
--- Comment #19 from jan.pfei...@centrum.cz ---
It doesn't take long to crash. I can confirm RECYCLE_FACADES did not help.
Currently I am running stable config NIO2 + HTTP/2 + Java 10. Let me know if
you will need any further assistance.
--
Yo
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62459
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |WONTFIX
--- Comment #15 from Mark Thomas
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62459
--- Comment #16 from Guido Jäkel ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #15)
> Please stop changing the resolution of this issue. The correct resolution is
> WONTFIX.
Sorry, but I don't change it by intention.
(In reply to Guido Jäkel from
Github user m-czernek commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/117#discussion_r212238007
--- Diff: webapps/docs/introduction.xml ---
@@ -89,6 +80,122 @@ same as $CATALINA_HOME.
+
+ Throughout the documentation, there a
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53977
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53883
--- Comment #2 from Mark Thomas ---
Frank, I know it has been quite a while. Is this still an issue?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53883
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60240
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62408
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ryl...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Mar
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48564
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49063
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52483
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ch...@christopherschultz.ne
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52483
--- Comment #4 from Mark Thomas ---
NOte that the duplicate was specifically interested in JkStripSession
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60240
--- Comment #11 from Rainer Jung ---
Aha, the reason seems to be that systemd sets the -D FOREGROUND define at
startup. In httpd code that means it won't call apr_proc_detach during()
startup in the MPM, and part of apr_proc_detach() is a call
Author: markt
Date: Thu Aug 23 21:53:35 2018
New Revision: 1838767
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1838767&view=rev
Log:
Having read bz 62408 and performed some testing, update the docs to make the
behaviour clear. This also re-enforces the need to apply the patch provided for
bz 62408 whi
Author: markt
Date: Thu Aug 23 21:55:11 2018
New Revision: 1838768
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1838768&view=rev
Log:
Correct status code
Modified:
tomcat/jk/trunk/xdocs/reference/workers.xml
Modified: tomcat/jk/trunk/xdocs/reference/workers.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/to
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62626
--- Comment #20 from jan.pfei...@centrum.cz ---
Calling NIO2+HTTP/2 stable was quite premature. With this config I get out of
memory (5G) every few hours. Strange, peak traffic isnt causing any obvious
problem.
--
You are receiving this mail b
20 matches
Mail list logo
