svn commit: r1792171 - /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/tribes/group/interceptors/MessageDispatchInterceptor.java

2017-04-21 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Fri Apr 21 09:53:16 2017 New Revision: 1792171 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1792171&view=rev Log: Silence IDE nags Add @Override markers Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/tribes/group/interceptors/MessageDispatchInterceptor.java Modified: tomcat/t

Re: Read events suspend/resume logic in websocket impl to achieve backpressure

2017-04-21 Thread Mark Thomas
On 19/04/17 11:43, Violeta Georgieva wrote: > Hi, > > 2017-03-29 23:59 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas : >> I think the problem is that "reading in progress" and suspended are >> treated separately when it is the combination of the two that represents >> the current state. >> >> If it were me, I'd probab

[Bug 61022] New: Returning Closed Connections to the Pool

2017-04-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61022 Bug ID: 61022 Summary: Returning Closed Connections to the Pool Product: Tomcat Modules Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity

[Bug 61022] Returning Closed Connections to the Pool

2017-04-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61022 Christopher Schultz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO --- Comment #1 from Chr

[Bug 61022] Returning Closed Connections to the Pool

2017-04-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61022 --- Comment #2 from Gary Murphy --- I am not sure what you are needing. I am using the connection pool with functional programming, not in a serlvet container as the normal use case would expect. As a result, I don't always easily have the re

[Bug 61022] Returning Closed Connections to the Pool

2017-04-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61022 --- Comment #3 from Christopher Schultz --- Are you saying that bug #48392 is actually not completely fixed? 48392 was reported for getResultSet().getConnection(), but the comments indicate that also getResultSet().getStatement().getConnection(

[Bug 60875] Process Request null pointer exception.

2017-04-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60875 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 60461] SIGSEGV in SSLSocket.getInfos

2017-04-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60461 matt...@cacorp.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|NEW --- Comment #15 from matt...@c

[Bug 61022] Returning Closed Connections to the Pool

2017-04-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61022 --- Comment #4 from Gary Murphy --- I didn't go back through the source code history, since 48392 was fixed in 2011. I suspect it was fixed properly and regressed at some subsequent refactor. I think the proper fix would be the one discussed t

[Bug 60461] SIGSEGV in SSLSocket.getInfos

2017-04-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60461 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO --- Comment #14 from Mark Thoma

[Bug 60875] Process Request null pointer exception.

2017-04-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60875 --- Comment #6 from Aaron --- (In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #5) > Several possible root causes for this have been fixed in 8.5.14 onwards. > > If you still see this issue with 8.5.14 or later, please re-open and provide > the steps to

[Bug 60461] SIGSEGV in SSLSocket.getInfos

2017-04-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60461 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 60461] SIGSEGV in SSLSocket.getInfos

2017-04-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60461 matt...@cacorp.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|NEW --- Comment #16 from matt...@c