https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61022
--- Comment #2 from Gary Murphy <g...@hilbertinc.com> --- I am not sure what you are needing. I am using the connection pool with functional programming, not in a serlvet container as the normal use case would expect. As a result, I don't always easily have the reference to the connection, unless I start passing it through the monad, which is possible, I suppose. I guess my expectation is that a proper implementation of a proxy design pattern would implement all of the use cases of the proxy. Or to put it another way, if 48392 was accepted as a bug, this should be, too. I took a second look at the code and my proposed solution might leak resources, so I updated the ConnectionPool class to check in the "returnConnection" method. What are our next steps, here? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
