.gz=/srv/gump/public/workspace/apache-commons/daemon/dist/bin/commons-daemon-20151029-native-src.tar.gz
-Dexamples.sources.skip=true
-Djdt.jar=/srv/gump/packages/eclipse/plugins/R-4.5-201506032000/ecj-4.5.jar
-Dtest.apr.loc=/srv/gump/public/workspace/tomcat-native-trunk/dest-20151029/lib
-Dt
Author: kfujino
Date: Thu Oct 29 08:28:57 2015
New Revision: 1711190
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1711190&view=rev
Log:
When creating a QueryStats object, ensure that maxQueries is checked.
If maxQueries is a value less than or equal to 0, QueryStats are never created.
Modified:
tomc
Author: kfujino
Date: Thu Oct 29 08:33:15 2015
New Revision: 1711191
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1711191&view=rev
Log:
When creating a QueryStats object, ensure that maxQueries is checked.
If maxQueries is a value less than or equal to 0, QueryStats are never created.
Modified:
tomc
Author: kfujino
Date: Thu Oct 29 08:36:22 2015
New Revision: 1711192
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1711192&view=rev
Log:
When creating a QueryStats object, ensure that maxQueries is checked.
If maxQueries is a value less than or equal to 0, QueryStats are never created.
Modified:
tomc
Hello Chris,
Thanks for pointing me to my mistake. I did not check
InheritableThreadLocal functionality enough. In my usecase not an issue I
think.
With 'default' I do not mean 'enabled by default'. I mean that it is
available in the classpath like the valves mentioned in
https://tomcat.apache.or
Chris and Mark,
On Oct 28, 2015 21:01, "Christopher Schultz"
wrote:
> Mark,
>
> On 10/28/15 12:34 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> > On 28/10/2015 13:01, Roel Storms wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >>
> >> I was looking into session management on Tomcat 8.0.29 and found this
> >> comment:
> >>
> >> In apach
On 28/10/2015 23:27, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> 2015-10-28 23:42 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
>
>> I would therefore like to propose that we switch the 6.0.x release
>> branch from RTC to CTR and am therefore calling a VOTE to make this change.
>>
>> [ ] Continue to use RTC for 6.0.x
>> [X] Switch 6.0.x t
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58244
--- Comment #4 from Petr Brouzda ---
We have similar (maybe the same) problem.
We run
- Tomcat 8.0.24 with APR.
- HTTPS APR connector with SSLVerifyClient="require".
- on Debian 6
Client is a legacy application with no HTTPS support. So it us
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58564
Bug ID: 58564
Summary: Simplify
Boolean.parseBoolean(System.getProperty("xxx"),
"false") to Boolean.getBoolean("xxx")
Product: Tomcat 8
Version: trunk
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58565
Bug ID: 58565
Summary: Connection will be closed on slow file download with
non blocking http protocol
Product: Tomcat 8
Version: 8.0.28
Hardware: PC
OS:
On 10/28/2015 11:42 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> [X] Switch 6.0.x to CTR
Basically there are so few fixes in 6.0.x that the RTC blocks any move
in 6.0.x
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58564
Konstantin Kolinko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|NEW
Am 29.10.2015 um 00:57 schrieb Konstantin Kolinko:
2015-10-29 1:42 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas :
All,
Many years ago, we switched all release branches to RTC primarily to
address a community problem where we could not agree on the best way
forward for some parts of the code.
RTC served us well. The
Mark,
On 10/28/15 6:42 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Many years ago, we switched all release branches to RTC primarily to
> address a community problem where we could not agree on the best way
> forward for some parts of the code.
>
> RTC served us well. The disagreements ceased pretty much instantly.
Roel,
On 10/29/15 6:32 AM, Roel Storms wrote:
> On Oct 28, 2015 21:01, "Christopher Schultz"
> wrote:
>> On 10/28/15 12:34 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> On 28/10/2015 13:01, Roel Storms wrote:
Hello,
I was looking into session management on Tomcat 8.0.29 and found this
comm
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58565
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
--- Comment #1 from Remy Mauch
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58565
--- Comment #2 from Dave ---
just as a note. i tried it with windows and linux and got the same
results/problems.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58565
--- Comment #3 from Remy Maucherat ---
After debugging, it looks like it's a combination of factors.
What happens is that the network stack buffers things a lot without blocking.
At some point it will block until everything gets flushed. Unfor
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58565
--- Comment #4 from Dave ---
so what do you recommend? our application is accessed by many of our customers
via gsm modem.
In some cases the speed is lower than 8kb/sec (gprs).
Which timeout do i have to change?
--
You are receiving this mail
Am 28. Oktober 2015 23:42:08 MEZ, schrieb Mark Thomas :
>All,
>
>Many years ago, we switched all release branches to RTC primarily to
>address a community problem where we could not agree on the best way
>forward for some parts of the code.
>
>RTC served us well. The disagreements ceased pretty m
space/apache-commons/daemon/dist/bin/commons-daemon-20151029-native-src.tar.gz
-Dexamples.sources.skip=true
-Djdt.jar=/srv/gump/packages/eclipse/plugins/R-4.5-201506032000/ecj-4.5.jar
-Dtest.apr.loc=/srv/gump/public/workspace/tomcat-native/dest-20151029/lib
-Dcommons-daemon.jar=/srv/gump/public/work
Author: remm
Date: Thu Oct 29 17:01:31 2015
New Revision: 1711303
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1711303&view=rev
Log:
After a timeout using a future, the operation that caused the timeout should be
cancelled, otherwise it will still be pending. Found it investigating 58565,
and could be
Author: remm
Date: Thu Oct 29 17:07:56 2015
New Revision: 1711305
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1711305&view=rev
Log:
Propagate SSL read timeouts and cancel properly, to be able to cancel the
operation if a timeout occurs.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/Secure
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57799
--- Comment #22 from Remy Maucherat ---
Investigating another issue, it seems possible this one is caused by a timeout
exception that gets swallowed, followed by a new read attempt. It is not really
a Tomcat bug if the theory is correct.
In tr
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58565
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Schultz ---
Bufferbloat strikes again. :(
Does NIOx have enough control over the underlying socket/connection to reduce
buffer sizes so that this problem is minimized?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58565
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58565
--- Comment #7 from Christopher Schultz ---
It seems like less buffer for NIO makes sense in general, though I agree that
changing the default is probably not necessary, here. It might be worth
mentioning in the documentation that NIO + slow sp
Author: remm
Date: Thu Oct 29 18:19:58 2015
New Revision: 1711315
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1711315&view=rev
Log:
Cancel pending blocking IO operation following a timeout in the NIO2 connector.
Modified:
tomcat/tc8.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/InternalNio2InputBuffer.j
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58565
--- Comment #8 from Remy Maucherat ---
It works for me with the right configuration, but not the default one, so I
chose WORKSFORME but I don't mind if someone wants to change it.
It would seem with the default buffer on Linux + localhost and
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58565
--- Comment #9 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> It would seem with the default buffer on Linux + localhost ...
1. If I understand correctly, real networks have some quality-of-service
mechanisms. A well known one is MTU s
2015-10-29 0:42 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas :
>
> All,
>
> Many years ago, we switched all release branches to RTC primarily to
> address a community problem where we could not agree on the best way
> forward for some parts of the code.
>
> RTC served us well. The disagreements ceased pretty much instant
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57799
--- Comment #23 from Justin ---
(In reply to Remy Maucherat from comment #21)
> This could use another trunk retest.
Built, ran /trunk@1711357. Client now throws exception connected to non-SSL
port too...
2015-10-29 16:44:58,287 exception [T
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57799
--- Comment #24 from Remy Maucherat ---
Hum, it's not trunk, it's branch 8 head. Anyway, the SSL thing was just
coincidental, never mind.
It would be nice in the channel read to capture the previous stack trace (throw
and catch an exception, p
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57799
--- Comment #25 from Remy Maucherat ---
When I say in the channel read, I mean here for the debug code:
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.Nio2Channel.read(Nio2Channel.java:133)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bu
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project tomcat-tc8.0.x-test-nio2 has an issue affecting its community
integration
>
> [ ] Continue to use RTC for 6.0.x
> [X] Switch 6.0.x to CTR
>
>
--
> Keiichi.Fujino
>
Author: kfujino
Date: Fri Oct 30 06:23:50 2015
New Revision: 1711402
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1711402&view=rev
Log:
No-functional changes.
Remove TODO.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/src/main/java/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/pool/interceptor/SlowQueryReportJmx.java
Modifie
Author: kfujino
Date: Fri Oct 30 06:24:26 2015
New Revision: 1711403
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1711403&view=rev
Log:
No-functional changes.
Remove TODO.
Modified:
tomcat/tc8.0.x/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/src/main/java/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/pool/interceptor/SlowQueryReportJmx.java
Author: kfujino
Date: Fri Oct 30 06:25:14 2015
New Revision: 1711404
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1711404&view=rev
Log:
No-functional changes.
Remove TODO.
Modified:
tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/src/main/java/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/pool/interceptor/SlowQueryReportJmx.java
39 matches
Mail list logo
