Re: Tomcat7 EL error (proprietaryEvaluate)

2013-03-09 Thread Mark Thomas
On 08/03/2013 22:55, Praveen Boppana wrote: > Hi, > > I'm very new to tomcat7 environment, we are migrating from oc4j to tomcat7. > We have an issue with EL in jsp pages throwing error > "The method proprietaryEvaluate(String, Class, PageContext, null, boolean) > is undefined for the type PageCont

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.38

2013-03-09 Thread Rainer Jung
On 07.03.2013 23:47, Mark Thomas wrote: > The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.38 release is now available for voting. > > It can be obtained from: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.38/ > The Maven staging repo is: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapach

Re: Tomcat7 EL error (proprietaryEvaluate)

2013-03-09 Thread Praveen Boppana
Ok, I'm new to this list, I will post it in users list. Thanks Praveen On Mar 9, 2013, at 5:14 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 08/03/2013 22:55, Praveen Boppana wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm very new to tomcat7 environment, we are migrating from oc4j to tomcat7. >> We have an issue with EL in jsp pa

Re: WebSocket progress report

2013-03-09 Thread Nick Williams
On Mar 7, 2013, at 5:33 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > The current status of the WebSocket implementation is largely complete. > > The remaining TODOs are (in roughly the order I intend to tackle them): > > 1. Implement decoding > 2. Figure out why there are failures in Autobahn with WSS and NIO and

Re: WebSocket progress report

2013-03-09 Thread Mark Thomas
On 09/03/2013 15:29, Nick Williams wrote: > > On Mar 7, 2013, at 5:33 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > >> The current status of the WebSocket implementation is largely >> complete. >> >> The remaining TODOs are (in roughly the order I intend to tackle >> them): >> >> 1. Implement decoding 2. Figure out

[Tomcat Wiki] Trivial Update of "AngeliaSa" by AngeliaSa

2013-03-09 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Tomcat Wiki" for change notification. The "AngeliaSa" page has been changed by AngeliaSa: http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/AngeliaSa New page: Hello and welcome. My name is Conrad Shippee though I don't really like being call

svn commit: r1454758 - in /tomcat/trunk: java/org/apache/tomcat/websocket/ java/org/apache/tomcat/websocket/pojo/ java/org/apache/tomcat/websocket/server/ test/org/apache/tomcat/websocket/pojo/

2013-03-09 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Sat Mar 9 19:14:18 2013 New Revision: 1454758 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1454758 Log: Get encoding and decoding working end to end with an associated unit test Added: tomcat/trunk/test/org/apache/tomcat/websocket/pojo/ tomcat/trunk/test/org/apache/tomcat/websocket/p

buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on tomcat-trunk

2013-03-09 Thread buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder tomcat-trunk while building ASF Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-trunk/builds/4054 Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: bb-vm_ubuntu Build Reason: scheduler Build Source St

Question on SERVLET_SPEC-57 (getSubmittedFileName)

2013-03-09 Thread Nick Williams
I'm implementing the Part#getSubmittedFileName method introduced in SERVLET_SPEC-57 [1]. o.a.c.core.ApplicationPart already has a getFilename method that accomplishes this that is not part of the interface but IS public. This method is used only in o.a.c.connector.Request (once), but that's eas

[Bug 54658] New: Implement Part#getSubmittedFileName from SERVLET_SPEC-57

2013-03-09 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54658 Bug ID: 54658 Summary: Implement Part#getSubmittedFileName from SERVLET_SPEC-57 Product: Tomcat 8 Version: trunk Hardware: All OS: All Sta

[Bug 54658] Implement Part#getSubmittedFileName from SERVLET_SPEC-57

2013-03-09 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54658 Nick Williams changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #30030|0 |1 is patch|

Re: Question on SERVLET_SPEC-57 (getSubmittedFileName)

2013-03-09 Thread Mark Thomas
Renaming the method is fine. We don't change the API for the sake of it but if there is a need to then it is fine. Mark Nick Williams wrote: >I'm implementing the Part#getSubmittedFileName method introduced in >SERVLET_SPEC-57 [1]. > >o.a.c.core.ApplicationPart already has a getFilename metho

Re: Question on SERVLET_SPEC-57 (getSubmittedFileName)

2013-03-09 Thread Nick Williams
On Mar 9, 2013, at 3:15 PM, Nick Williams wrote: > I'm implementing the Part#getSubmittedFileName method introduced in > SERVLET_SPEC-57 [1]. > > o.a.c.core.ApplicationPart already has a getFilename method that accomplishes > this that is not part of the interface but IS public. This method is

Re: Question on SERVLET_SPEC-57 (getSubmittedFileName)

2013-03-09 Thread Nick Williams
On Mar 9, 2013, at 3:49 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > Renaming the method is fine. > > We don't change the API for the sake of it but if there is a need to then it > is fine. > > Mark Look at you top-posting. :-P You replied just as I was. I deprecated getFilename and wrapped it around getSubmit

Re: Question on SERVLET_SPEC-57 (getSubmittedFileName)

2013-03-09 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2013/3/10 Nick Williams : > > On Mar 9, 2013, at 3:49 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > >> Renaming the method is fine. >> >> We don't change the API for the sake of it but if there is a need to then it >> is fine. >> >> Mark > > Look at you top-posting. :-P > > You replied just as I was. I deprecated getF

Re: Question on SERVLET_SPEC-57 (getSubmittedFileName)

2013-03-09 Thread Mark Thomas
Nick Williams wrote: > >On Mar 9, 2013, at 3:49 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > >> Renaming the method is fine. >> >> We don't change the API for the sake of it but if there is a need to >then it is fine. >> >> Mark > >Look at you top-posting. :-P :-) Sorry. Mobile client wasn't configured properly

Servlet 3.1 Request Upgrade

2013-03-09 Thread Nick Williams
Mark, I noticed the HttpServletRequest upgrade method still had the signature void upgrade(HttpUpgradeHandler) when it should be T upgrade(Class) per the latest spec. What's your status on getting this changed? I started to try to clean this up a bit (I can email you a partial patch that has

[Bug 54659] New: Echo Websocket Sample using Annotation API throws IllegalStateException

2013-03-09 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54659 Bug ID: 54659 Summary: Echo Websocket Sample using Annotation API throws IllegalStateException Product: Tomcat 8 Version: trunk Hardware: PC Status: NEW

[Bug 54658] Implement Part#getSubmittedFileName from SERVLET_SPEC-57

2013-03-09 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54658 Nick Williams changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #30030|0 |1 is obsolete|

Re: Question on SERVLET_SPEC-57 (getSubmittedFileName)

2013-03-09 Thread Nick Williams
On Mar 9, 2013, at 4:57 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > Nick Williams wrote: > >> >> On Mar 9, 2013, at 3:49 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: >> >>> Renaming the method is fine. >>> >>> We don't change the API for the sake of it but if there is a need to >> then it is fine. >>> >>> Mark >> >> Look at you t

[Bug 54660] New: AccessLogValve fileDateFormat can not be changed through JMX

2013-03-09 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54660 Bug ID: 54660 Summary: AccessLogValve fileDateFormat can not be changed through JMX Product: Tomcat 7 Version: 7.0.22 Hardware: PC OS: Linux

[Bug 54660] AccessLogValve fileDateFormat can not be changed through JMX

2013-03-09 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54660 Arnaud Kleinveld changed: What|Removed |Added CC||arnaud.kleinv...@gmail.com --

Bug report for Tomcat Connectors [2013/03/10]

2013-03-09 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Taglibs [2013/03/10]

2013-03-09 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 8 [2013/03/10]

2013-03-09 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 6 [2013/03/10]

2013-03-09 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 7 [2013/03/10]

2013-03-09 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat Native [2013/03/10]

2013-03-09 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat Modules [2013/03/10]

2013-03-09 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned