svn commit: r1146994 - in /tomcat/trunk: modules/jdbc-pool/src/main/java/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/pool/TrapException.java modules/jdbc-pool/src/test/java/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/test/Bug50571.java res/ma

2011-07-15 Thread rjung
Author: rjung Date: Fri Jul 15 07:48:27 2011 New Revision: 1146994 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1146994&view=rev Log: Missing svn:eol-style. Please fix your svn config. Thanks. Modified: tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/src/main/java/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/pool/TrapException.java

Re: Tomcat 7 under Java 7

2011-07-15 Thread Mark Thomas
On 15/07/2011 01:22, Henri Gomez wrote: > Hi guys, > > I conducted some tests with Tomcat 7 (7.0.19) and I noticed a slower > startup time under Java 7 (OpenJDK) than under Java 1.6. > I also see a serious boost in startup between TC 6.0.32 and TC 7.0.19, > Jetty is not too far behind. > > I blog

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51475] GzipInterceptor#decompress is not completly implemented

2011-07-15 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51475 --- Comment #4 from Christian Stöber 2011-07-15 09:55:47 UTC --- Mark, because it's not desirable and efficient to compress small packages, I've modified the code that it compress only packages with a size greater than 2048 bytes. Should

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.19

2011-07-15 Thread Rainer Jung
On 14.07.2011 11:21, Mark Thomas wrote: > The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.19 release is now available for voting. > > It can be obtained from: > http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.19/ > The svn tag is: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc7.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_7_0_19/ > > The prop

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.19

2011-07-15 Thread Mark Thomas
On 15/07/2011 11:10, Rainer Jung wrote: > AJP connection persistance is fine for BIO and APR. The experimental NIO > seems to still not use persistent AJP connections, but is IMHO no show > stopper, because it is new and marked as experimental in the docs. That is odd. There is a unit test that ch

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51475] GzipInterceptor#decompress is not completly implemented

2011-07-15 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51475 --- Comment #5 from Mark Thomas 2011-07-15 10:16:52 UTC --- New bug please. This should be user configurable. I'd suggest an attribute name of minCompressionSize -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=e

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.19

2011-07-15 Thread Mark Thomas
On 14/07/2011 10:21, Mark Thomas wrote: > The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.19 release is now available for voting. > > It can be obtained from: > http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.19/ > The svn tag is: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc7.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_7_0_19/ > > The prop

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51475] GzipInterceptor#decompress is not completly implemented

2011-07-15 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51475 --- Comment #6 from Christian Stöber 2011-07-15 10:25:18 UTC --- Ok, I'll will file a bug. It is user configurable. Based on the compression option in org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocoll I called it compressionMinSize. ;) -- Config

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51513] New: GzipInterceptor: Do not compress small packages

2011-07-15 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51513 Bug #: 51513 Summary: GzipInterceptor: Do not compress small packages Product: Tomcat 6 Version: 6.0.29 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity

How can i change JSESSIONIDSSO cookie name?

2011-07-15 Thread Mathan Karthik
Hi Guys, I have JSESSIONIDSSO cookie related problem. Currently I'm running two web applications in the same machine, but using two different tomcat servers. Both the applications has the same context path, but port numbers are different. I've enabled single sign on feature in in one of the

Re: How can i change JSESSIONIDSSO cookie name?

2011-07-15 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2011/7/15 Mathan Karthik : > Hi Guys, > > I have JSESSIONIDSSO cookie related problem. > > Currently I'm running two web applications in the same machine, but using two > different tomcat servers. Both the applications has the same context path, > but port numbers are different. > > I've enabled

Re: Tomcat 7 under Java 7

2011-07-15 Thread Rainer Jung
On 15.07.2011 02:22, Henri Gomez wrote: > Hi guys, > > I conducted some tests with Tomcat 7 (7.0.19) and I noticed a slower > startup time under Java 7 (OpenJDK) than under Java 1.6. > I also see a serious boost in startup between TC 6.0.32 and TC 7.0.19, > Jetty is not too far behind. > > I blog

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.19

2011-07-15 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2011/7/14 Mark Thomas : > The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.19 release is now available for voting. > > It can be obtained from: > http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.19/ > The svn tag is: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc7.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_7_0_19/ > > The proposed 7.0.19 releas

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.19

2011-07-15 Thread Rainer Jung
On 15.07.2011 12:14, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 15/07/2011 11:10, Rainer Jung wrote: >> AJP connection persistance is fine for BIO and APR. The experimental NIO >> seems to still not use persistent AJP connections, but is IMHO no show >> stopper, because it is new and marked as experimental in the doc

Re: Tomcat 7 under Java 7

2011-07-15 Thread Henri Gomez
> No relevant difference on Solaris Sparc between 1.6.0_24 and 1.7.0-b147: > > Java 6 > > Initialization processed in 2482 ms > Server startup in 2622 ms > > Java 7 > > Initialization processed in 2443 ms > Server startup in 2839 ms > > No significant differences in scan times, bt there might be no

Re: Tomcat 7 under Java 7

2011-07-15 Thread Henri Gomez
>> No relevant difference on Solaris Sparc between 1.6.0_24 and 1.7.0-b147: >> >> Java 6 >> >> Initialization processed in 2482 ms >> Server startup in 2622 ms >> >> Java 7 >> >> Initialization processed in 2443 ms >> Server startup in 2839 ms >> >> No significant differences in scan times, bt ther

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.19

2011-07-15 Thread Rainer Jung
Value of DEFAULT_CONNECTION_TIMEOUT in java/org/apache/coyote/http11/Constants.java public static final int DEFAULT_CONNECTION_TIMEOUT = 6; java/org/apache/coyote/ajp/Constants.java public static final int DEFAULT_CONNECTION_TIMEOUT = -1; Anf for BIO AJP this -1 lead to infinite time

Re: How can i change JSESSIONIDSSO cookie name?

2011-07-15 Thread Mathan Karthik
Hi Konstantin Kolinko, If i change the context path of one of the application, It will work. But unfortunately, i can't change. Both the applications are running in same context path, but in different ports. Why i can't change JSESSIONIDSSO cookie name ? Is it a bug? Regards, Mathan Karthi

Re: How can i change JSESSIONIDSSO cookie name?

2011-07-15 Thread Mark Thomas
On 15/07/2011 14:12, Mathan Karthik wrote: > Hi Konstantin Kolinko, > > If i change the context path of one of the application, It will work. But > unfortunately, i can't change. Both the applications are running in same > context path, but in different ports. > > > Why i can't change JSESSIO

Re: How can i change JSESSIONIDSSO cookie name?

2011-07-15 Thread Mathan Karthik
Hi Marks and Konstantin Kolinko Thanks for the info. I'll contact us...@tomcat.apache.org for more details. Regards, Mathan Karthik R On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 19:41:29 +0530 Mark Thomas wrote On 15/07/2011 14:12, Mathan Karthik wrote: > Hi Konstantin Kolinko, > >

svn commit: r1147263 - /tomcat/trunk/java/javax/servlet/AsyncContext.java

2011-07-15 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Fri Jul 15 17:51:10 2011 New Revision: 1147263 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1147263&view=rev Log: Add some units info to the Javadocs Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/javax/servlet/AsyncContext.java Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/javax/servlet/AsyncContext.java URL: htt

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51515] New: Comet over HTTPS: END event recieved immeidately for the first few times

2011-07-15 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51515 Bug #: 51515 Summary: Comet over HTTPS: END event recieved immeidately for the first few times Product: Tomcat 6 Version: 6.0.20 Platform: PC OS/Version: Lin

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51513] GzipInterceptor: Do not compress small packages

2011-07-15 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51513 Konstantin Kolinko changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #1 fr