Bug report for Taglibs [2011/06/26]

2011-06-26 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 7 [2011/06/26]

2011-06-26 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 5 [2011/06/26]

2011-06-26 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat Connectors [2011/06/26]

2011-06-26 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 6 [2011/06/26]

2011-06-26 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat Native [2011/06/26]

2011-06-26 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat Modules [2011/06/26]

2011-06-26 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Re: Using eval vs. exec in shell scripts

2011-06-26 Thread Rainer Jung
On 26.06.2011 01:45, bradleymccrorey wrote: > > I'll be watching this quite closely. We run thousands of TC6 instances onsite > here, and are a daemontools shop. This change breaks daemontools, as the > "svc" command will attempt to stop the tomcat service by sending a TERM to > the catalina.sh pr

Re: Using eval vs. exec in shell scripts

2011-06-26 Thread bradleymccrorey
Rainer Jung-3 wrote: > > > Did you follow the later messages in this discusison thread? > > I made an error in not including all quotes use din catalina.sh in my > simpl test script. So when using the correct scripts, the eval did *not* > leave a copy of the shel process hanging around. > I

Re: Using eval vs. exec in shell scripts

2011-06-26 Thread Rainer Jung
On 26.06.2011 17:35, bradleymccrorey wrote: > > > Rainer Jung-3 wrote: >> >> >> Did you follow the later messages in this discusison thread? >> >> I made an error in not including all quotes use din catalina.sh in my >> simpl test script. So when using the correct scripts, the eval did *not* >> l

Re: Using eval vs. exec in shell scripts

2011-06-26 Thread bradleymccrorey
Rainer Jung-3 wrote: > >> >> You can clearly see here that there are two processes: one for the shell >> script, and one for the actual java process. Is this not what I should be >> seeing? > > You should, bot only when using "run", which is precisely meant to not > decouple the console from t

svn commit: r1139904 - /tomcat/trunk/bin/catalina.sh

2011-06-26 Thread rjung
Author: rjung Date: Sun Jun 26 18:34:10 2011 New Revision: 1139904 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1139904&view=rev Log: Use "eval exec" instead of "eval" for "catalina.sh run". Originally it was "exec" before we switched to "eval" which leaves an additional intermediate shell process hangi

Re: Using eval vs. exec in shell scripts

2011-06-26 Thread Rainer Jung
On 26.06.2011 17:59, bradleymccrorey wrote: > > > Rainer Jung-3 wrote: >> >>> >>> You can clearly see here that there are two processes: one for the shell >>> script, and one for the actual java process. Is this not what I should be >>> seeing? >> >> You should, bot only when using "run", which i

Re: svn commit: r1139576 - in /tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs: changelog.xml project.xml upgrading.xml

2011-06-26 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2011/6/25 : > Author: markt > Date: Sat Jun 25 17:47:46 2011 > New Revision: 1139576 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1139576&view=rev > Log: > Add an upgrade page to the documentation that can be used to determine the > changes in any of the configuration files between two given version