On 26.06.2011 01:45, bradleymccrorey wrote: > > I'll be watching this quite closely. We run thousands of TC6 instances onsite > here, and are a daemontools shop. This change breaks daemontools, as the > "svc" command will attempt to stop the tomcat service by sending a TERM to > the catalina.sh process, which leaves the child java process still running. > > For one customer who insists on TC7, I've had to take the measure of > changing the catalina.sh script to use the old method for now. This is not > maintainable, however. Should there be a bug filed somewhere for this? > > Cheers, > Bradley McCrorey
Did you follow the later messages in this discusison thread? I made an error in not including all quotes use din catalina.sh in my simpl test script. So when using the correct scripts, the eval did *not* leave a copy of the shel process hanging around. If you think there is a problem, you can discuss the technical details here, and if the list doesn't find a solution for you, you can open a bug. Regards, Rainer > Rainer Jung-3 wrote: >> >> Since Mladens change r918873 in March 2010 we use eval instead of exec >> in the shell scripts. The svn log says: >> >> "Use eval instead direct call or exec command so that arguments with >> spaces are properly handled" >> >> Eval leaves a copy of the shell process hanging around until Tomcat >> shutdown. I want to experiment with different solutions, but have no >> idea, what kind of whitespace use the switch from exec to eval was >> supposed to change. >> >> Mladen or whoever else understood this: can you give an example which >> didn't work with the exec based scripts? >> >> Regards, >> >> Rainer --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
