https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49960
Summary: HttpServletRequest.getCharacterEncoding does not break
up the Content-Disposition header well.
Product: Tomcat 5
Version: 5.5.23
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49929
--- Comment #4 from brett.dellegra...@intact-is.com 2010-09-20 09:07:58 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=26055)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26055)
testcase: Servlet for writing directly to output stream
This
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49964
Summary: Allow parsing of application/x-www-form-urlencoded
request body into getParameter methods for PUT
requests
Product: Tomcat 6
Version: unspecified
Pla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49964
Christopher Schultz changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS/Version||All
--- Comment #1 from Chri
Hi,
I upgrade our application from tomcat 5.5 & java 1.5 to Tomcat 6 and 1.6
When I run the tomcat 6 using batch file (using catlina.bat) it works
perfectly fine, However when the tomcat is installed as service our main
java script file (it is a huge Dojo resource) seems to be cut somehow and
the
All,
I'm attempting a patch for
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49964 and I'd like to
write a few unit tests for it. In the Tomcat 6.0.x trunk, I can only
find what appear to be 30-40 test files. Is there a test suite elsewhere
that I can download and augment in order to properl
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49935
--- Comment #2 from Peter Giles 2010-09-20 14:41:59
EDT ---
I verified that this issue still exists in Tomcat 5.5.31 as well. Not sure how
to flag the issue for that since the version isn't known to Bugzilla yet.
--
Configure bugmail: h
> From: liorpf [mailto:lior.pe...@amdocs.com]
> Subject: Tomcat service VS start as batch file
> I upgrade our application from tomcat 5.5 & java 1.5 to
> Tomcat 6 and 1.6
Exact Tomcat versions? Using APR or not? Exact JDK version? Exact platform
you're running on? (Windows something, appa
We are not using APR
Everything is teh same except that the service is using the JRE DLL while
batch file is using java under the JDK installation
n828cl wrote:
>
>> From: liorpf [mailto:lior.pe...@amdocs.com]
>> Subject: Tomcat service VS start as batch file
>
>> I upgrade our application fro
On 20/09/2010 20:53, liorpf wrote:
>
> We are not using APR
> Everything is teh same except that the service is using the JRE DLL while
> batch file is using java under the JDK installation
Probably a discussion for the Users List, rather than the developers
list, for now at least.
p
0x625908
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49935
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|5.5.30 |5.5.31
--- Comment #3 from Mark Thom
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49964
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48692
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ch...@christopherschultz.ne
On 20/09/2010 11:29, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> All,
>
> I'm attempting a patch for
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49964 and I'd like to
> write a few unit tests for it. In the Tomcat 6.0.x trunk, I can only
> find what appear to be 30-40 test files. Is there a test suite e
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48692
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Schultz
2010-09-20 16:40:52 EDT ---
I'll copy my comments from the duplicate bug #49964 just so they're more likely
to be read:
My proposal is this (and I'm prepared to write the patches myself):
1. A new
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48692
--- Comment #3 from Mark Thomas 2010-09-20 16:45:51 EDT ---
How about parsePutBodyParams (since POST will always be parsed) with values
false (default) or true?
The logic for STRICT_SERVLET_COMPLIANCE in 7.0.x has been made more consistent
Mark,
On 9/20/2010 4:33 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 20/09/2010 11:29, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> I'm attempting a patch for
>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49964 and I'd like to
>> write a few unit tests for it. In the Tomcat 6.0.x trunk, I can only
>> find what
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48692
--- Comment #4 from Christopher Schultz
2010-09-20 16:50:00 EDT ---
In one of the discussions on the tomcat-user list, the OP had complained that
he couldn't pass "parameters" using methods such as DELETE, etc. I figured I'd
let the config
On 20/09/2010 13:46, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> 1. There's a method in catalina.connector.Connector called init(). When
> does that get called? I had expected that it would be called after all
> the setXXX attributes had be set on it from the digester upon start-up,
> but it appears that Connect
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48692
--- Comment #5 from Mark Thomas 2010-09-20 16:54:15 EDT ---
OK. A comma separated list of method names would make sense in that case.
Although methods that are not allowed to have bodies should not be permitted.
--
Configure bugmail: http
Mark,
On 9/20/2010 4:52 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> That'll probably be better in 7.0.x. I do wonder what init code you
> might need. I was expecting a simple boolean attribute. Once that is
> sorted, we can figure out how to port it to 6.0.x
Since I was thinking of allowing any set of HTTP methods,
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48692
--- Comment #6 from Christopher Schultz
2010-09-20 17:02:15 EDT ---
Hmm. I was trying to avoid an exhaustive or partial list of HTTP methods
specifically in the code: I wanted to let this code grow to work with any crazy
non-standard metho
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> Subject: Re: Writing unit tests
> > Yep. Go with the current style of the file.
> Gotcha.
Just remember: no bloody tabs (even if the source file still has some).
- Chuck
THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OT
>> 2. Coding conventions seem to be applied ... inconsistently. Is there a
>> code style guide that I can actually follow so my code "looks right", or
>> should I just look at what's already there in the files I'm modifying
>> and take my best guess at what's appropriate?
>
> Yep. Go with the curre
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48692
--- Comment #7 from Christopher Schultz
2010-09-20 18:15:54 EDT ---
Okay, I've got my patch working in TC 7, and I've renamed the configuration
setting to the less unwieldy "parseBodyMethods".
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.
On 20/09/2010 15:04, Wesley Acheson wrote:
>>> 2. Coding conventions seem to be applied ... inconsistently. Is there a
>>> code style guide that I can actually follow so my code "looks right", or
>>> should I just look at what's already there in the files I'm modifying
>>> and take my best guess at
Sorry missed that. Somehow though I think I may have seen it just not
when I was last looking for it. The fact that I named it such seems
like I had it in my subconsious. Sorry
Wes
[OT] Is it actually any use the extent I've tried to be involved?
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:58 AM, Mark Thomas wr
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Wesley Acheson
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
>> On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 12:26 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> You need to be able to quote the section of the spec that demonstrates
>>> it is wrong. Having quickly scanned the 2.5 and 3
On 20/09/2010 16:09, Wesley Acheson wrote:
> Sorry missed that. Somehow though I think I may have seen it just not
> when I was last looking for it. The fact that I named it such seems
> like I had it in my subconsious. Sorry
np. There is plenty of scope to improve that along the lines you
suggest
On 20/09/2010 16:19, Wesley Acheson wrote:
> Just a friendly nudge I'm not looking into this any further because I
> don't know what the correct behaviour is. The servlet documentation
> isn't clear as stated. I feel I lean the other way than Mark in that I
> think the bug is valid. However unless
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49965
Summary: JAASRealm uses wrong string constants
Product: Tomcat 6
Version: 6.0.29
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49942
konstantin.s.serebry...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||konstantin.s.ser
32 matches
Mail list logo
