To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project tomcat-trunk-validate has an issue affecting its community integration.
Th
Author: markt
Date: Thu Aug 5 09:51:41 2010
New Revision: 982525
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=982525&view=rev
Log:
Skip repackaged DBCP in validate target (Gump was running it). Any build where
the deps are downloaded inside the svn checkout would fail in a similar manner
Modified:
On 05.08.2010 11:51, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Thu Aug 5 09:51:41 2010
New Revision: 982525
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=982525&view=rev
Log:
Skip repackaged DBCP in validate target (Gump was running it). Any build where
the deps are downloaded inside the svn checkou
On 05/08/2010 11:12, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 05.08.2010 11:51, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Thu Aug 5 09:51:41 2010
>> New Revision: 982525
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=982525&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Skip repackaged DBCP in validate target (Gump was running it). Any
On 04.08.2010 22:47, Mark Thomas wrote:
I'm happy to see all of this configuration completely re-written if that
is what is required. That said, this is just a start-up optimisation.
I think we need three groups:
a) never scan (JAR or TLD)
b) default jarsToSkip
c) default noTldJar
I'd suggest a
On 05.08.2010 12:19, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 05/08/2010 11:12, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 05.08.2010 11:51, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Thu Aug 5 09:51:41 2010
New Revision: 982525
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=982525&view=rev
Log:
Skip repackaged DBCP in validate target (Gum
Dear Mark, Rainer, Konstantin,
Thank you for your fast and detailed answers.
You are right, the proposal is erroneous. However my intention was not to
give an excellent implementation solving the problem, but to start a
conversation about it and to provide a 0th approach, which can be reworked,
r
Author: markt
Date: Thu Aug 5 12:55:15 2010
New Revision: 982589
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=982589&view=rev
Log:
Code clean up in o.a.t.until.net.jsse
- @Override
- import order
- unused code
- unnecessary code
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/jsse/JSSEFa
Author: markt
Date: Thu Aug 5 15:50:50 2010
New Revision: 982669
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=982669&view=rev
Log:
Extend fix for https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48545 to aid
back-port to 6.0.x by better aligning behaviours
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48545
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24845|0 |1
is obsolete|
Author: markt
Date: Thu Aug 5 16:50:29 2010
New Revision: 982686
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=982686&view=rev
Log:
Propose new patch
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.tx
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48817
Matt Passell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25439|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48817
Matt Passell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25398|0 |1
is obsolete|
I see 2 options for your case :
- either use JRebel which allows to reload classes even in jars that would be
the common or shared classloaded (I use it all the times, it's fabulous and
pays for itself very quickly)
- or try JBoss which has a Unified Class Loader, and as far as I understood it,
Author: markt
Date: Thu Aug 5 20:09:06 2010
New Revision: 982757
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=982757&view=rev
Log:
Docs only CTR
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49585
Update for changes in Commons Daemon packaging
Modified:
tomcat/tc5.5.x/trunk/container/webap
Author: markt
Date: Thu Aug 5 20:37:46 2010
New Revision: 982768
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=982768&view=rev
Log:
Docs only CTR
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49585
Update for changes in Commons Daemon packaging
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/ch
Author: markt
Date: Thu Aug 5 20:38:03 2010
New Revision: 982770
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=982770&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49585
Update for changes in Commons Daemon packaging
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
tomcat
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49585
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49711
Summary: HttpServletRequest#getParts() does not work in a
Filter
Product: Tomcat 7
Version: 7.0.0
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Se
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49711
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas 2010-08-05 16:51:57 EDT ---
I've just read the spec and my reading of the spec is that this is expected to
work. A quick look at the code suggests it should work. If you want to dig into
this yourself, start
Hi all!
[X] Beta - go ahead and release as 7.0.2 Beta
>
It seems very close to stable, to me.
One thing I noticed while testing 7.0.2 is that the WebModule MBean
ObjectNames differ slightly from those of Tomcat 6. Example:
Tomcat 7.0.2, ObjectName for the context "/":
Catalina:j2eeType=WebMo
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49711
--- Comment #2 from balusc 2010-08-05 17:11:24 EDT ---
Correction: it didn't return null, it returned an empty collection.
I will dig in the source.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
---
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #70 from Mark Thomas 2010-08-05 17:52:54 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #69)
"May require some work"?
It sure does. The following needs to be supported:
- Start Tomcat
- Via JMX, select the host
- Create a new context
- Configur
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49711
--- Comment #3 from balusc 2010-08-05 17:57:50 EDT ---
Well, the getWrapper().getMultipartConfigElement() at line 2493 always returns
null and thus an empty collection will be returned. Only when I call getParts()
inside a Servlet with @Mul
On 05/08/2010 11:38, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 04.08.2010 22:47, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> I'm happy to see all of this configuration completely re-written if that
>> is what is required. That said, this is just a start-up optimisation.
>>
>> I think we need three groups:
>> a) never scan (JAR or TLD)
>>
Author: markt
Date: Thu Aug 5 22:27:53 2010
New Revision: 982811
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=982811&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48817
Add Validator interface and allow users to configure a Validator class name
Added:
tomcat/trunk/modules/jd
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48817
--- Comment #12 from Mark Thomas 2010-08-05 18:31:28 EDT ---
Looks good to me. Patch applied. Many thanks.
Any chance of a patch for the docs?
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You a
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49714
Summary: The annotation process of Jar should not impact
distributable of web.xml.
Product: Tomcat 7
Version: trunk
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Author: kfujino
Date: Fri Aug 6 02:19:28 2010
New Revision: 982850
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=982850&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49714
The annotation process of Jar doesn't influence distributable element of
web.xml.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49714
Keiichi Fujino changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Author: kfujino
Date: Fri Aug 6 05:21:59 2010
New Revision: 982875
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=982875&view=rev
Log:
my votes
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=9
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #71 from chamith buddhika 2010-08-06
01:50:32 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #70)
> (In reply to comment #69)
I am little bit confused here.
> - Start Tomcat
I was under the impression Tomcat should have been already started fo
Author: kfujino
Date: Fri Aug 6 05:56:21 2010
New Revision: 982877
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=982877&view=rev
Log:
Add Null check when CHANGE_SESSION_ID message received.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/ha/session/DeltaManager.java
tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/cha
Author: kfujino
Date: Fri Aug 6 06:02:37 2010
New Revision: 982878
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=982878&view=rev
Log:
proposal
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=9
Author: kfujino
Date: Fri Aug 6 06:03:38 2010
New Revision: 982879
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=982879&view=rev
Log:
proposal
Modified:
tomcat/tc5.5.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc5.5.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc5.5.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=9
On 08/05/2010 10:09 PM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
-tar xvfz jsvc.tar.gz
-cd jsvc-src
+tar xvfz commons-deamon-native.tar.gz
+cd commons-daemon-1.0.x-native-src/unix
autoconf
Note that 'autoconf' is not needed
src package already contains generated configure,
so
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #72 from Mark Thomas 2010-08-06 02:46:42 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #71)
> (In reply to comment #70)
> > (In reply to comment #69)
>
> I am little bit confused here.
> > - Start Tomcat
>
> I was under the impression Tomcat s
37 matches
Mail list logo
