On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> On Jul 12, 2010, at 7:04 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>
>> I'm going to ping Xalan about the increase in time taken as expressions are
>> evaluated as I would assume I'm doing something silly.
>
> I looked into the Xalan implementation and the p
Author: kfujino
Date: Thu Jul 15 07:27:32 2010
New Revision: 964328
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=964328&view=rev
Log:
vote
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=96432
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49595
Summary: Tomcat crashes in tcnative-1.dll occasionally
Product: Tomcat 6
Version: 6.0.26
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows Server 2003
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49595
--- Comment #1 from Anil Saraswathy 2010-07-15 06:36:54 EDT
---
Using Java version 1.6.0_20
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49595
--- Comment #2 from Anil Saraswathy 2010-07-15 06:40:33 EDT
---
Configuration: IIS with SSL as front-end and Tomcat via ISAPI.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving thi
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49595
Anil Saraswathy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Tomcat crashes in |Tomcat crashes in
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49595
--- Comment #3 from Anil Saraswathy 2010-07-15 07:05:12 EDT
---
TCNATIVE-1.DLL version is 1.1.20
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You ar
I'm teaching a Tomcat course today and tomorrow and one of the students
raised the question why is the default host called localhost? The
implied relationship to 127.0.0.1 was causing confusion. That got me
thinking:
1. Is there a better name for the default host
2. If there is, should we cha
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 01:51:04PM +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
> I'm teaching a Tomcat course today and tomorrow and one of the students
> raised the question why is the default host called localhost? The
> implied relationship to 127.0.0.1 was causing confusion. That got me
> thinking:
I am abou
2010/7/15 Mark Thomas :
> I'm teaching a Tomcat course today and tomorrow and one of the students
> raised the question why is the default host called localhost? The implied
> relationship to 127.0.0.1 was causing confusion. That got me thinking:
>
> 1. Is there a better name for the default host
>
On 15.07.2010 15:34, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2010/7/15 Mark Thomas:
I'm teaching a Tomcat course today and tomorrow and one of the students
raised the question why is the default host called localhost? The implied
relationship to 127.0.0.1 was causing confusion. That got me thinking:
1. Is th
-0
Since the host name should be a valid dns name(ok it doesn't need to be
a valid dns name if is used), choosing a default which doesn't
have a valid dns name may cause woes.
But if someone came up with a fantastic alternate default name, then I
could be swayed.
-Tim
On 7/15/2010 8:51
On 15/07/2010 15:16, Tim Funk wrote:
-0
Since the host name should be a valid dns name(ok it doesn't need to be
a valid dns name if is used), choosing a default which doesn't
have a valid dns name may cause woes.
If it does need to be a valid dns name then localhost absolutely makes
sense. W
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 8:11 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 15/07/2010 15:16, Tim Funk wrote:
>
>> -0
>>
>> Since the host name should be a valid dns name(ok it doesn't need to be
>> a valid dns name if is used), choosing a default which doesn't
>> have a valid dns name may cause woes.
>>
>
> If it
IIRC, there is no requirement. But from a mapping point of view, the
name used should match what the browser is sending in the "Host:" field.
Tomcat (iirc) doens't do any lookups based on the name field for Host so
from that point of view - life in DNS is OK.
But to access the tomcat server -
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49428
Panagiotis Astithas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25584|0 |1
is obsolete|
Author: rjung
Date: Thu Jul 15 17:35:28 2010
New Revision: 964505
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=964505&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=123456
Check whether bugtraq:logregex conflicts with bugtraq:message. Docs indicate
this, reality will show.
First t
Author: rjung
Date: Thu Jul 15 18:12:58 2010
New Revision: 964518
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=964518&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111222
Try commit using subclipse eclipse plugin.
Mixed "message"! and "logregex" configuraton.
Added:
tomcat/san
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #61 from Mark Thomas 2010-07-15 16:52:12 EDT ---
Ping. No update/progress in over a week. Again.
Overall I am beginning to have serious concerns about the rate of progress of
this project.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues
Folks,
It looks like we have a regression in the cookie handling. Invalidating
the session and then requesting a new session results in a mal-formed
header (in trunk) and I have seen similar reports from one of our
support customers on 6.0.28.
I have a test case and am working on this now.
Mark
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49598
Summary: Session update fails and adds second cookie header
without header name
Product: Tomcat 7
Version: trunk
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Author: markt
Date: Thu Jul 15 21:32:35 2010
New Revision: 964611
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=964611&view=rev
Log:
Test case for https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49598
Multiple invalid session cookies
Added:
tomcat/trunk/test/org/apache/catalina/connector/TestRespo
Author: markt
Date: Thu Jul 15 21:37:41 2010
New Revision: 964614
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=964614&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49598
When updating the session cookie header, actually update it rather than adding
a new header without a name.
Mo
Author: markt
Date: Thu Jul 15 21:56:04 2010
New Revision: 964622
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=964622&view=rev
Log:
Proposal
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=964
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49598
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas 2010-07-15 17:56:40 EDT ---
Fixed in 7.0.x and will be in 7.0.1 onwards.
Proposed for 6.0.x
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this m
Author: kkolinko
Date: Thu Jul 15 23:52:48 2010
New Revision: 964647
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=964647&view=rev
Log:
vote
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=9646
Author: kfujino
Date: Fri Jul 16 00:19:35 2010
New Revision: 964651
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=964651&view=rev
Log:
vote
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=96465
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #62 from chamith buddhika 2010-07-15
21:45:46 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #61)
> Ping. No update/progress in over a week. Again.
>
> Overall I am beginning to have serious concerns about the rate of progress of
> this project
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49570
Thai Ha changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> I'm teaching a Tomcat course today and tomorrow and one of the students
> raised the question why is the default host called localhost? The implied
> relationship to 127.0.0.1 was causing confusion. That got me thinking:
>
> 1. Is there a bette
On 7/15/2010 9:44 PM, Yoav Shapira wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> I'm teaching a Tomcat course today and tomorrow and one of the students
>> raised the question why is the default host called localhost? The implied
>> relationship to 127.0.0.1 was causing confusion
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49595
--- Comment #4 from Anil Saraswathy 2010-07-16 02:35:34 EDT
---
This crash is observed in the following scenario:
Two user requests arrive at the server simultaneously. One is busy reading
application data and returning the same to the bro
32 matches
Mail list logo
