On 08/07/2010 06:37, Marc Guillemot wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Mark Thomas wrote:
>> ...
>> There is nothing stopping you running FindBugs, Checkstyle or any other
>> tool locally. I use FindBugs on the Tomact 7 code-base all the time.
>
> what about sharing the config and including it into the build?
Mark Thomas wrote:
...
JavadocType (versionFormat) -> currently 539 failures
Not sure what exactly you are proposing here. Could you clarify?
I mean the format of the @Version JavaDoc tag what Konstantin Kolinko
has started to fix:
http://tomcat.markmail.org/thread/bfry4x5gwbhezo6x
...
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Tomcat Wiki" for change
notification.
The "TomcatVersions" page has been changed by markt.
The comment on this change is: Re-order to list latest first. Update 7.0.x
info. Update list of unsupported versions..
http://wiki.a
Author: markt
Date: Thu Jul 8 09:00:47 2010
New Revision: 961647
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=961647&view=rev
Log:
Update post release of 7.0.0 beta
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/TOMCAT-7-RELEASE-PLAN.txt
Modified: tomcat/trunk/TOMCAT-7-RELEASE-PLAN.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/
On 08.07.2010 01:14, sebb wrote:
On 7 July 2010 21:19, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 07.07.2010 21:00, sebb wrote:
On 7 July 2010 10:47, Rainer Jungwrote:
On 29.06.2010 17:17, jean-frederic clere wrote:
- build.properties: it would be nice, if you did the release changes to
the
file before
On 08.07.2010 10:30, Marc Guillemot wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
...
JavadocType (versionFormat) -> currently 539 failures
Not sure what exactly you are proposing here. Could you clarify?
I mean the format of the @Version JavaDoc tag what Konstantin Kolinko
has started to fix:
http://tomcat.ma
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #58 from chamith buddhika 2010-07-08
07:05:50 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=25733)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25733)
o.a.Catalina.users Patch
Removes non existent class descriptors.
--
Con
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #59 from chamith buddhika 2010-07-08
07:09:03 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=25734)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25734)
o.a.Catalina.valves Patch
Removes non existent class descriptors and adds
Author: jfclere
Date: Thu Jul 8 11:37:08 2010
New Revision: 961720
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=961720&view=rev
Log:
Add my long key.
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/KEYS
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/KEYS
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/KEYS?rev=961720&r1=9
Author: jfclere
Date: Thu Jul 8 12:11:29 2010
New Revision: 961726
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=961726&view=rev
Log:
6.0.27 wasn't released.
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.o
On Jul 1, 2010, at 12:11 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> The builds for Tomcat 5.5.30 are ready for testing and approval.
> The candidates binaries are available here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~jim/tomcat-5.5/
>
> According to the release process, the 5.5.30 build corresponding to the
> tag TO
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 3:59 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 08.07.2010 01:14, sebb wrote:
>>
>> On 7 July 2010 21:19, Rainer Jung wrote:
>>>
>>> On 07.07.2010 21:00, sebb wrote:
On 7 July 2010 10:47, Rainer Jung wrote:
>
> On 29.06.2010 17:17, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>>>
>
Author: markt
Date: Thu Jul 8 15:48:48 2010
New Revision: 961819
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=961819&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49503
Revert the protocol handler component of r940656. Subsequent lifecycle fixes
have resolved the issues that requ
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49503
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49555
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |normal
--- Comment #3 from Mark Thom
Hi,
after the discussion about code style (http://tomcat.markmail.org/thread/2c7lkzmpcuxqpgjj
), I think that we must vote for this fix:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49268
It includes a starting point for a very limited checkstyle ruleset.
+1: progressively introduce che
Author: jfclere
Date: Thu Jul 8 16:09:11 2010
New Revision: 961827
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=961827&view=rev
Log:
change for the 6.0.28 release and put back the standard logo.
Modified:
tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/download-60.xml
tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/index.xml
tomcat/site/
Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/security-impact.html
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/site/trunk/docs/security-impact.html?rev=961828&r1=961827&r2=961828&view=diff
==
--- tomcat/site/trunk/docs/security-impact.htm
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 18:02 +0200, Peter Roßbach wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after the discussion about code style
> (http://tomcat.markmail.org/thread/2c7lkzmpcuxqpgjj
> ), I think that we must vote for this fix:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49268
> It includes a starting point
On 8 July 2010 16:22, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 3:59 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>> On 08.07.2010 01:14, sebb wrote:
>>>
>>> On 7 July 2010 21:19, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 07.07.2010 21:00, sebb wrote:
>
> On 7 July 2010 10:47, Rainer Jung wrote:
>>
>> On
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project tomcat-taglibs-standard has an issue affecting its community
integration.
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 9:36 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 8 July 2010 16:22, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>
>> IIUC, it means the tag would not refer to any trunk revision.
>
> Strictly speaking, yes, there is no exact match in trunk, because the
> version fixes are deliberately not applied to trunk.
>
>> It get
Author: jim
Date: Thu Jul 8 18:28:01 2010
New Revision: 961868
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=961868&view=rev
Log:
5.5.30
Modified:
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/download-55.html
tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/download-55.xml
Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/download-55.html
URL:
http://svn.a
2010/7/7 sebb :
>
> Or:
>
> Create clean workspace from SVN.
>
> Make any necessary updates that apply to the tag only.
>
> Create the tag from the workspace using svn copy dir https://.../
>
> Trunk is then untainted by unnecessary changes, and the tag commit
> e-mail shows the changes made.
> His
On 8 July 2010 17:57, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 9:36 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 8 July 2010 16:22, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>>
>>> IIUC, it means the tag would not refer to any trunk revision.
>>
>> Strictly speaking, yes, there is no exact match in trunk, because the
>> version fixe
Author: markt
Date: Thu Jul 8 21:19:39 2010
New Revision: 961942
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=961942&view=rev
Log:
Tab police
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/javax/servlet/jsp/tagext/FunctionInfo.java
Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/javax/servlet/jsp/tagext/FunctionInfo.java
URL:
http://s
Author: markt
Date: Thu Jul 8 21:28:21 2010
New Revision: 961947
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=961947&view=rev
Log:
Test case for https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49555
Fix to follow shortly
Added:
tomcat/trunk/test/webapp-3.0/bug49555.jsp (with props)
Modified:
Author: markt
Date: Thu Jul 8 21:29:12 2010
New Revision: 961948
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=961948&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49555
Correctly handle tag libraries that use functions defined in static inner
classes
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/j
Author: markt
Date: Thu Jul 8 21:30:16 2010
New Revision: 961949
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=961949&view=rev
Log:
Proposal
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=961
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49555
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Jasper |Jasper
Product|Tomcat 7
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49574
Summary: ConcurrentModificationException when updating a WAR
file
Product: Tomcat 6
Version: 6.0.20
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Sever
Author: kkolinko
Date: Thu Jul 8 21:41:08 2010
New Revision: 961955
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=961955&view=rev
Log:
vote
Modified:
tomcat/tc5.5.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc5.5.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc5.5.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=9619
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49574
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #60 from Mark Thomas 2010-07-08 17:56:28 EDT ---
All patches applied. Many thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are t
Author: markt
Date: Thu Jul 8 22:22:34 2010
New Revision: 961963
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=961963&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48297
Use the HandlerInfo to initialise the HandlerChain, rather than adding to it
which clearly isn't correct.
>From
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48297
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49576
Summary: 飞过海
Product: Tomcat 3
Version: Unknown
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
Component: Servlet
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49576
Bill Barker changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
38 matches
Mail list logo
