Re: Redeclaration of variables by tag handler (BZ 48616, 42390)

On 16/02/2010 03:36, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > The examples webapp appears to be working with this, and tests in > trunk do pass, with exception of about 50% of cookie tests. You can't run the cookie tests in one go in Eclipse as each test needs to be run in a new JVM. If you run them one at a

svn commit: r910424 - /tomcat/jk/trunk/native/iis/jk_isapi_plugin.c

Author: mturk Date: Tue Feb 16 08:25:24 2010 New Revision: 910424 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910424&view=rev Log: Allow chunking compilation by default. User still needs to set the enable_chunked_encoding to enable the protocol. Modified: tomcat/jk/trunk/native/iis/jk_isapi_plugin

svn commit: r910434 - /tomcat/jk/trunk/native/iis/jk_isapi_plugin.c

Author: mturk Date: Tue Feb 16 08:41:41 2010 New Revision: 910434 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910434&view=rev Log: Add few code comments. No functional change Modified: tomcat/jk/trunk/native/iis/jk_isapi_plugin.c Modified: tomcat/jk/trunk/native/iis/jk_isapi_plugin.c URL: http://

Re: jk/cluster - intelligent systems load

On 16/02/2010 07:01, Mladen Turk wrote: > On 02/16/2010 12:24 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: >> On 15/02/2010 21:52, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: >>> why not just a servlet filter? >> >> +1. I was going to suggest the same thing. >> > > Why not reusing the clustering code for that. > It would allow

Re: jk/cluster - intelligent systems load

On 02/16/2010 09:56 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: I don't see why the current set of valid cluster nodes could not be passed back via a header. Exactly. That raises the interesting question of if a node goes down, which component will notice first? The proxy or the cluster? With long timeouts in t

Re: jk/cluster - intelligent systems load

On 16/02/2010 09:08, Mladen Turk wrote: > On 02/16/2010 09:56 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: >> The other thing it potentially allows is the cluster to tell the proxy >> about which nodes are in the cluster, allowing a more dynamic >> configuration. Not sure I'd want to use that in production, but in dev >

svn commit: r910442 - /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/security/SecurityClassLoad.java

Author: markt Date: Tue Feb 16 09:27:49 2010 New Revision: 910442 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910442&view=rev Log: Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48580 Prevent AccessControlException if first access is to a JSP that uses a FunctionMapper Modified: tomcat/tru

svn commit: r910443 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

Author: markt Date: Tue Feb 16 09:29:36 2010 New Revision: 910443 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910443&view=rev Log: Proposal Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=910

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48580] 6.0.24: AccessControlException in ProtectedFunctionMapper on first access to certain JSP

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48580 --- Comment #4 from Mark Thomas 2010-02-16 09:29:49 UTC --- This has been fixed in 7.0.x and proposed for 6.0.x -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because:

Re: jk/cluster - intelligent systems load

On 02/16/2010 10:21 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: On 16/02/2010 09:08, Mladen Turk wrote: On 02/16/2010 09:56 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: The other thing it potentially allows is the cluster to tell the proxy about which nodes are in the cluster, allowing a more dynamic configuration. Not sure I'd want to

svn commit: r910471 - /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/servlet/JspServletWrapper.java

Author: markt Date: Tue Feb 16 11:07:00 2010 New Revision: 910471 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910471&view=rev Log: Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48582 Avoid NPE as config may be null but ctxt won't be Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/servlet/Jsp

svn commit: r910473 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

Author: markt Date: Tue Feb 16 11:08:04 2010 New Revision: 910473 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910473&view=rev Log: Proposal Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=910

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48582] JspServletWrapper.getServletContext() throws NullPointerException

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48582 --- Comment #3 from Mark Thomas 2010-02-16 11:08:19 UTC --- Fixed in 7.0.x and proposed for 6.0.x -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You ar

svn commit: r910485 - /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/realm/JNDIRealm.java

Author: markt Date: Tue Feb 16 11:40:55 2010 New Revision: 910485 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910485&view=rev Log: Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48589 Make JNDIRealm easier to extend by making the User class protected Based on a patch by Candid Dauth Modified:

svn commit: r910486 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

Author: markt Date: Tue Feb 16 11:42:14 2010 New Revision: 910486 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910486&view=rev Log: Proposal Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=910

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48750] New: performance problems with JSF 1.2

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48750 Summary: performance problems with JSF 1.2 Product: Tomcat 6 Version: 6.0.24 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48589] org.apache.catalina.realm.JNDIRealm User class should be accessible from sub-classes

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48589 --- Comment #2 from Mark Thomas 2010-02-16 11:44:03 UTC --- Thanks for the patch. I didn't use it directly but used it as the basis for the fix I have applied to 7.0.x and proposed for 6.0.x For future reference, please provide patches in

Timing for 6.0.25?

Mainly a question for Jean-Frederic, but what are the thoughts on aiming for a 6.0.25 release quite soon? There were a handful of regressions in 6.0.24 it would be good to fix. Also, if folks have a little time, there are a reasonable number of proposals in the STATUS file for review. While some a

Re: svn commit: r910485 - /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/realm/JNDIRealm.java

On 16/02/2010, ma...@apache.org wrote: > Author: markt > Date: Tue Feb 16 11:40:55 2010 > New Revision: 910485 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910485&view=rev > Log: > Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48589 > Make JNDIRealm easier to extend by making the User

Re: Timing for 6.0.25?

Is there a list of such regressions? Doing a search for bugs specifically against 6.0.24 and then looking for those labeled as regressions shows one bug: 48701 . 48616 is labe

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48750] performance problems with JSF 1.2

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48750 --- Comment #1 from Michael Heinen 2010-02-16 12:24:01 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=25001) --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25001) Jsps - source and java - Source jsp 1000hout.jsp - JSP compiled with Tomcat

Re: Timing for 6.0.25?

On 16/02/2010 12:20, Jess Holle wrote: > Is there a list of such regressions? > > Doing a search for bugs specifically against 6.0.24 and then looking for > those labeled as regressions shows one bug: 48701 > . > > 48616

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48750] performance problems with JSF 1.2

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48750 Michael Heinen changed: What|Removed |Added Platform|PC |All --- Comment #2 from Michael H

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48750] performance problems with JSF 1.2

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48750 Michael Heinen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@recommind.com -- Configure

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48750] performance problems with JSF 1.2

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48750 Remy Maucherat changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48600] Performance issue with tags

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48600 --- Comment #7 from Remy Maucherat 2010-02-16 13:00:02 UTC --- *** Bug 48750 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this m

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48750] performance problems with JSF 1.2

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48750 --- Comment #4 from Michael Heinen 2010-02-16 13:17:13 UTC --- Could anybody pls explain why this is a duplicate of bug #48600? I set metadata-complete="true" in web.xml Moreover the patch attached in 48600 does not improve speed further

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48600] Performance issue with tags

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48600 --- Comment #8 from Remy Maucherat 2010-02-16 13:44:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > JBoss use a DummpAnnotationProcessor to remove this capabilities. I think, > now, > JBoss can use this new version. Which version of JBoss AS are yo

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48750] performance problems with JSF 1.2

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48750 --- Comment #5 from Remy Maucherat 2010-02-16 13:56:03 UTC --- The performance levels do not seem catastrophic, so the severity is very appropriate. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ---

Re: Timing for 6.0.25?

On 02/16/2010 12:52 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > Mainly a question for Jean-Frederic, but what are the thoughts on aiming > for a 6.0.25 release quite soon? There were a handful of regressions in > 6.0.24 it would be good to fix. > +1 on my side :-) Cheers Jean-Frederic ---

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48600] Performance issue with tags

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48600 Philippe Prados changed: What|Removed |Added CC||apa...@prados.fr --- Comment #9

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48608] welcome-file ignores filter mapping

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48608 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

Re: Timing for 6.0.25?

On Feb 16, 2010, at 9:03 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: > On 02/16/2010 12:52 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: >> Mainly a question for Jean-Frederic, but what are the thoughts on aiming >> for a 6.0.25 release quite soon? There were a handful of regressions in >> 6.0.24 it would be good to fix. >> > > +

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.20

I'm +1 On Feb 15, 2010, at 2:57 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Give me 24hrs... I'll be able to test tomorrow AM. > > On Feb 15, 2010, at 1:54 PM, Mladen Turk wrote: > >> On 02/10/2010 11:19 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >> >> Ping. Anyone? >> >> >> Regards >> -- >> ^TM >> >> ---

Re: Timing for 6.0.25?

On 16/02/2010 14:03, jean-frederic clere wrote: > On 02/16/2010 12:52 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: >> Mainly a question for Jean-Frederic, but what are the thoughts on aiming >> for a 6.0.25 release quite soon? There were a handful of regressions in >> 6.0.24 it would be good to fix. >> > > +1 on my sid

svn commit: r910584 - /tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/html-manager-howto.xml

Author: kkolinko Date: Tue Feb 16 16:34:10 2010 New Revision: 910584 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910584&view=rev Log: correct a misprint Modified: tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/html-manager-howto.xml Modified: tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/html-manager-howto.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org

Re: Timing for 6.0.25?

On 02/16/2010 05:15 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 16/02/2010 14:03, jean-frederic clere wrote: >> On 02/16/2010 12:52 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: >>> Mainly a question for Jean-Frederic, but what are the thoughts on aiming >>> for a 6.0.25 release quite soon? There were a handful of regressions in >>> 6.0

svn commit: r910604 - in /tomcat/trunk: build.xml res/META-INF/annotations-api.jar.manifest res/META-INF/bootstrap.jar.manifest res/META-INF/default.notice res/META-INF/el-api.jar.manifest

Author: markt Date: Tue Feb 16 17:23:23 2010 New Revision: 910604 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910604&view=rev Log: Manifest improvements - automate copyright year - add manifests for el & annotations - improve default NOTICE - add info to bootstrap manifest Added: tomcat/trunk/res/M

svn commit: r910612 - /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/manager/ManagerServlet.java

Author: kkolinko Date: Tue Feb 16 17:29:57 2010 New Revision: 910612 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910612&view=rev Log: If the memory leak occured in the ROOT application, display "/" instead on an empty line It might be better to apply this fix to StandardHost.findReloadedContextMemory

Re: jk/cluster - intelligent systems load

On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 1:38 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: > On 02/16/2010 10:21 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > >> On 16/02/2010 09:08, Mladen Turk wrote: >> >>> On 02/16/2010 09:56 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: >>> The other thing it potentially allows is the cluster to tell the proxy about which nodes ar

svn commit: r910643 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

Author: kkolinko Date: Tue Feb 16 18:35:40 2010 New Revision: 910643 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910643&view=rev Log: vote and propose a corrected patch Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6

svn commit: r910644 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

Author: markt Date: Tue Feb 16 18:39:08 2010 New Revision: 910644 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910644&view=rev Log: Proposal Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=910

Re: svn commit: r910644 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2010/2/16 : > Author: markt > Date: Tue Feb 16 18:39:08 2010 > New Revision: 910644 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910644&view=rev > Log: > Proposal > > Modified: >    tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt > > + > +* Various manifest improvements > +   > http://people.apache.org/~markt/patch

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48611] Can't build "extras" in 6.0.24. default.manifest does not exist

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48611 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

svn commit: r910650 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

Author: markt Date: Tue Feb 16 18:59:48 2010 New Revision: 910650 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910650&view=rev Log: Withdraw proposal - it is included in a wider manifest proposal Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt URL: http://svn.ap

svn commit: r910665 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

Author: markt Date: Tue Feb 16 19:56:41 2010 New Revision: 910665 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910665&view=rev Log: Respond to question Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.

svn commit: r910666 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

Author: kkolinko Date: Tue Feb 16 19:58:40 2010 New Revision: 910666 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910666&view=rev Log: add patch URL for BZ 48498 Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/tru

svn commit: r910674 - in /tomcat: tc5.5.x/trunk/STATUS.txt tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

Author: kkolinko Date: Tue Feb 16 20:27:20 2010 New Revision: 910674 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910674&view=rev Log: vote and propose for 5.5 Modified: tomcat/tc5.5.x/trunk/STATUS.txt tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/tc5.5.x/trunk/STATUS.txt URL: http://svn.ap

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48616] Struts 1.2 and bean:define tag throws jsp 1.1 regression exception

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48616 --- Comment #23 from Mark Thomas 2010-02-16 20:45:19 UTC --- Trunk patch looks good to me. Feel free to apply it (reverting my previous fix). -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are

svn commit: r910683 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

Author: markt Date: Tue Feb 16 20:49:18 2010 New Revision: 910683 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910683&view=rev Log: Withdraw my proposal. Vote for Konstantin's. Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tom

svn commit: r910693 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

Author: markt Date: Tue Feb 16 21:13:18 2010 New Revision: 910693 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910693&view=rev Log: Withdraw patch. Bug has a better fix proposed. Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/t

svn commit: r910695 - /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/realm/JNDIRealm.java

Author: markt Date: Tue Feb 16 21:15:21 2010 New Revision: 910695 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910695&view=rev Log: Revert r904913. https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48629 now proposes a better solution Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/realm/JNDIRealm

Re: svn commit: r910644 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2010/2/16 Konstantin Kolinko : > 2010/2/16  : >> Author: markt >> Date: Tue Feb 16 18:39:08 2010 >> New Revision: 910644 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910644&view=rev >> Log: >> Proposal >> >> Modified: >>    tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt >> > >> + >> +* Various manifest improvement

svn propchange: r910695 - svn:log

Author: kkolinko Revision: 910695 Modified property: svn:log Modified: svn:log at Tue Feb 16 21:30:56 2010 -- --- svn:log (original) +++ svn:log Tue Feb 16 21:30:56 2010 @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -Revert r904913. https://issues.apac

Re: svn commit: r910644 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

On 16/02/2010 21:24, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > 2010/2/16 Konstantin Kolinko : >> 2010/2/16 : >>> Author: markt >>> Date: Tue Feb 16 18:39:08 2010 >>> New Revision: 910644 >>> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910644&view=rev >>> Log: >>> Proposal >>> >>> Modified: >>>tomcat/tc6.0.x/t

Re: svn commit: r910644 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2010/2/17 Mark Thomas : > On 16/02/2010 21:24, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: >> 2010/2/16 Konstantin Kolinko : >>> 2010/2/16  : Author: markt Date: Tue Feb 16 18:39:08 2010 New Revision: 910644 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910644&view=rev Log: Proposal >

Re: svn commit: r910644 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

On 16/02/2010 21:33, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 16/02/2010 21:24, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: >> 2. el-api.jar contains unfiltered @el.revision@ in its manifest > > I'll fix that. Fixed. It was a copy/paste error. >> 3. If you build extras after building tomcat, all files in extras >> >> extras\catal

svn commit: r910792 - in /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/compiler: Generator.java Node.java ScriptingVariabler.java

Author: kkolinko Date: Wed Feb 17 01:10:34 2010 New Revision: 910792 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910792&view=rev Log: Apply my patch from https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48616#c20 This patch - Reverts r905145, - Provides an alternative fix for bug 48616 and bug 42390,

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48616] Struts 1.2 and bean:define tag throws jsp 1.1 regression exception

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48616 --- Comment #24 from Konstantin Kolinko 2010-02-17 01:11:59 UTC --- Applied to trunk (r910792), proposed for 6.0 and 5.5. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mai

svn commit: r910796 - /tomcat/trunk/java/javax/servlet/jsp/el/ImplicitObjectELResolver.java

Author: kkolinko Date: Wed Feb 17 01:52:41 2010 New Revision: 910796 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910796&view=rev Log: Fix a bug in ImplicitObjectELResolver.ScopeMap intruduced when applying generics there: the get(String) and remove(String) methods were not overwriting the ones of Abst

svn commit: r910803 - /tomcat/trunk/java/javax/servlet/jsp/el/ImplicitObjectELResolver.java

Author: kkolinko Date: Wed Feb 17 02:26:41 2010 New Revision: 910803 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910803&view=rev Log: Provide slightly more efficient implementations for ScopeMap.size() and ScopeMap.containsKey(). Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/javax/servlet/jsp/el/ImplicitObjectELRes

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.20

2010/2/10 Mladen Turk : > Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.20 is: > > [x] Stable - no major issues, no regressions Tested win32 binaries only. Minor: *.md5 and *.sha1 files should have " *" between checksum and filename, because those files are binary. md5sum/sha1sum that I am using were saying that th

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48756] New: I am not finding "commons-collections-3.1.jar" in tomcat 5.5.28

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48756 Summary: I am not finding "commons-collections-3.1.jar" in tomcat 5.5.28 Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.5.28 Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: NEW

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.20

On 02/17/2010 05:12 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: 2010/2/10 Mladen Turk: Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.20 is: [x] Stable - no major issues, no regressions Tested win32 binaries only. Minor: *.md5 and *.sha1 files should have " *" between checksum and filename, because those files are binary. md

[RESULTS] Was: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.20

We have collected 4 binding votes, so I'll proceed with the release. Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.20 is: [X] Stable - no major issues, no regressions [ ] Beta - at least one significant issue -- tell us what it is [ ] Alpha - multiple significant issues -- tell us what they are Regards -- ^TM