https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45357
Tim Whittington changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24427
Tim Whittington changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48083
--- Comment #4 from gre...@familyfischer.net 2010-01-08 01:02:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Please use the Tomcat Users list if you need help configuring IIS7.
> The IIS HOWTO is a bit out of date, so if you still need help I can sup
>> Any comments on including the experimental SPDY support (
>> http://www.chromium.org/spdy/spdy-protocol ) ?
>> I know we had countless debates on JK2 and http proxies, but some extra code
>> to try out doesn't hurt :-)
>
> We need a httpd module (like mod_proxy_ajp) for that :-)
mod_proxy_spdy
I think I have got to the bottom of why the EL has been so fragile and
why the fixes to the various edge case bug fixes have invariably created
new edge cases. It is probably easier to explain by considering an
example. Using the echo tag from the newly added EL test cases consider
the following JS
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 11:36 +, Mark Thomas wrote:
> I have some rough code that implements this scheme. I am in the process
> of integrating it into Jasper for trunk. I can see this taking little
> while to iron out the wrinkles before I'll be ready t propose a
> back-port for 6.0.x. I don't th
+1 to trunk
-0 for backport to 6.0.x
Is this legal? ${'\'}${1+1}
Shouldn't it be: ${'\\'}${1+1}
Or phrased another way, what should I see on the screen with this:
${1+1}${'\t'}${1+1}
"2 2" or "2\t2"
-Tim
On 1/8/2010 6:36 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
One area where help would be appreciated is in
On 08/01/2010 11:53, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 11:36 +, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> I have some rough code that implements this scheme. I am in the process
>> of integrating it into Jasper for trunk. I can see this taking little
>> while to iron out the wrinkles before I'll be rea
On 08/01/2010 12:18, Tim Funk wrote:
> +1 to trunk
> -0 for backport to 6.0.x
>
> Is this legal? ${'\'}${1+1}
> Shouldn't it be: ${'\\'}${1+1}
Yes it should.
and the Java code to append the \ is:
result.append("${''}");
This is part of what makes this so tricky to get right. The quoting
rule
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.19 is:
>
> [ X ] Stable - no major issues, no regressions
> [ ] Beta - at least one significant issue -- tell us what it is
> [ ] Alpha - multiple significant issues -- tell us what they are
Yoav
---
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48510
Summary: Memory leak after undeploying web application using
custom log formatter
Product: Tomcat 6
Version: 6.0.20
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47679
--- Comment #2 from brett.prucha@scrb.navy.mil 2010-01-08 06:45:29 UTC ---
I'm not sure you understand what I mean by "extension". I am referring to the
IIS application mappings (Website properties / Home Directory / Configuration
under
On 01/08/2010 11:15 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
>>> Any comments on including the experimental SPDY support (
>>> http://www.chromium.org/spdy/spdy-protocol ) ?
>>> I know we had countless debates on JK2 and http proxies, but some extra code
>>> to try out doesn't hurt :-)
>>
>> We need a httpd module (
Hello,
I'm using mod_jk to forward all apache requests to /reportsvcs_ws/* to
tomcat and I have a question regarding basic auth. I need to ensure the
user has been authorized prior to the /reportsvcs_ws/* request and I'm
unsure as the best angle to take. Is there anything that can be configure
On 08/01/2010 16:12, cgswtsu78 wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm using mod_jk to forward all apache requests to /reportsvcs_ws/* to
> tomcat and I have a question regarding basic auth. I need to ensure the
> user has been authorized prior to the /reportsvcs_ws/* request and I'm
> unsure as the best ang
+1
On Jan 8, 2010, at 8:02 AM, Yoav Shapira wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
>> Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.19 is:
>>
>> [ X ] Stable - no major issues, no regressions
>> [ ] Beta - at least one significant issue -- tell us what it is
>> [ ] Alpha - multiple significa
On 01/05/2010 03:50 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.19 is:
[X] Stable - no major issues, no regressions
[ ] Beta - at least one significant issue -- tell us what it is
[ ] Alpha - multiple significant issues -- tell us what they are
OK. We have 4 binding +1 votes.
I'll procee
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 2:15 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
> >> Any comments on including the experimental SPDY support (
> >> http://www.chromium.org/spdy/spdy-protocol ) ?
> >> I know we had countless debates on JK2 and http proxies, but some extra
> code
> >> to try out doesn't hurt :-)
> >
> > We nee
Author: markt
Date: Fri Jan 8 18:59:19 2010
New Revision: 897300
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=897300&view=rev
Log:
Now the EL parser doesn't unquote stuff it shouldn't (r896589), remove the
attributeValueWithEL() method as it is causing more problems than it is
solving. There are still
On 08/01/2010 18:54, Costin Manolache wrote:
> Yes. BTW - if you use maven, it'll download, build and test against tomcat6
> jars ( since tomcat7 is not in maven ).
It is a few months out of date but it is there. I was planning on
another update when I get the EL stuff fixed.
http://people.apache
Well, I'll take a look a Tomcat Lite and SPDY :)
And see what can be done
2010/1/8 Costin Manolache :
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 2:15 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
>
>> >> Any comments on including the experimental SPDY support (
>> >> http://www.chromium.org/spdy/spdy-protocol ) ?
>> >> I know we had co
2010/1/8 Mark Thomas :
> On 08/01/2010 18:54, Costin Manolache wrote:
>> Yes. BTW - if you use maven, it'll download, build and test against tomcat6
>> jars ( since tomcat7 is not in maven ).
>
> It is a few months out of date but it is there. I was planning on
> another update when I get the EL st
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 08/01/2010 18:54, Costin Manolache wrote:
> > Yes. BTW - if you use maven, it'll download, build and test against
> tomcat6
> > jars ( since tomcat7 is not in maven ).
>
> It is a few months out of date but it is there. I was planning on
>
On 08/01/2010 19:12, Henri Gomez wrote:
> 2010/1/8 Mark Thomas :
>> On 08/01/2010 18:54, Costin Manolache wrote:
>>> Yes. BTW - if you use maven, it'll download, build and test against tomcat6
>>> jars ( since tomcat7 is not in maven ).
>>
>> It is a few months out of date but it is there. I was pl
Could you do it again ?
2010/1/8 Mark Thomas :
> On 08/01/2010 19:12, Henri Gomez wrote:
>> 2010/1/8 Mark Thomas :
>>> On 08/01/2010 18:54, Costin Manolache wrote:
Yes. BTW - if you use maven, it'll download, build and test against tomcat6
jars ( since tomcat7 is not in maven ).
>>>
>>>
On 08/01/2010 20:34, Henri Gomez wrote:
> Could you do it again ?
I could (as could any other committer) but I'd rather wait a day or so
until I finish off this JSP/EL work. I'm almost there...
Mark
>
> 2010/1/8 Mark Thomas :
>> On 08/01/2010 19:12, Henri Gomez wrote:
>>> 2010/1/8 Mark Thomas :
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Konstantin Kolinko
wrote:
> 2010/1/6 Mark Thomas :
>> On 06/01/2010 00:27, Costin Manolache wrote:
>>> Also, I would like to know if other comitters are OK with (temporarily -
>>> i.e. until the 7.0 release vote) including lite in the tomcat7 builds,
>>> so people c
Author: kkolinko
Date: Sat Jan 9 02:00:48 2010
New Revision: 897367
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=897367&view=rev
Log:
vote
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=8973
Author: kkolinko
Date: Sat Jan 9 02:13:19 2010
New Revision: 897368
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=897368&view=rev
Log:
Correction for the README pages:
Tomcat 7 requires Java 6
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/RELEASE-NOTES
tomcat/trunk/res/welcome.bin.html
tomcat/trunk/res/welcome.mai
Author: kkolinko
Date: Sat Jan 9 02:18:42 2010
New Revision: 897369
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=897369&view=rev
Log:
add "or later" to the JRE version requirement mentioned on the README pages
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/res/welcome.bin.html
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/res/welcome.
Author: kkolinko
Date: Sat Jan 9 02:25:44 2010
New Revision: 897370
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=897370&view=rev
Log:
Trivial: move first line of the resource file to be below the license header
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/resources/LocalStrings_es.propert
Author: kkolinko
Date: Sat Jan 9 02:39:19 2010
New Revision: 897371
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=897371&view=rev
Log:
Trivial corrections to the French and Japanese resource files of Jasper:
- correct Jasper version mentioned in a message
- comment-out untranslated messages in the French
Author: kkolinko
Date: Sat Jan 9 02:50:41 2010
New Revision: 897375
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=897375&view=rev
Log:
Trivial: comment-out untranslated messages, so that the English ones could be
used
Modified:
tomcat/tc5.5.x/trunk/jasper/src/share/org/apache/jasper/resources/Loca
Author: kkolinko
Date: Sat Jan 9 03:59:59 2010
New Revision: 897380
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=897380&view=rev
Log:
Followup for r816252/r891328
Allow to disable buffering in JULI FileHandler
The previous implementation did not work as expected because of buffering
performed by Output
Author: kkolinko
Date: Sat Jan 9 04:30:14 2010
New Revision: 897381
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=897381&view=rev
Log:
Update documentation
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/logging.xml
Modified: tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/logging.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk
Author: kkolinko
Date: Sat Jan 9 04:48:37 2010
New Revision: 897382
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=897382&view=rev
Log:
proposal and comments
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/ST
2010/1/4 Konstantin Kolinko :
> Hi, all!
>
> I removed the libtcnative-1.dll files of Tomcat Native 1.1.18 from
> www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/native/1.1.18/binaries
>
5 days passed, and the current status is the following:
a) the libtcnative-1.dll files are still present at
http:
37 matches
Mail list logo
