Author: jfclere
Date: Thu Sep 17 07:05:22 2009
New Revision: 816076
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=816076&view=rev
Log:
My vote.
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=8
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47760
--- Comment #2 from Uwe Günther 2009-09-17 08:53:26 PDT ---
I did a bit of investigation in this one.:
1) It seems to me this isn't a bug.
2) It seems to me you are mixing up two different deployment methods.
But let me explain it:
>Fro
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47760
Uwe Günther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||u...@cscc.de
--
Configure bugmail:
Author: fhanik
Date: Thu Sep 17 16:07:13 2009
New Revision: 816252
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=816252&view=rev
Log:
Enable the ability to disable the buffered writer. This does bunch of copying
when writing using an async thread there is no need for such a thing
Modified:
tomcat/tr
Author: markt
Date: Thu Sep 17 16:10:05 2009
New Revision: 816254
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=816254&view=rev
Log:
Replace parseException instance field
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/startup/ContextConfig.java
Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/startu
How does this work, if someone identifies a bug as NO BUG, does somebody
set the status to "Resolved" in Bugzilla or better: How is the work flow
here and who can close/resolve a bug?
In my case, I did some research in 47760 and IMO it isn't a bug. I but a
comment there, CC-ed myself but what
Anyone can change a bug to any status. (Much like in wikipedia - anyone
can edit any page) Then the community would police people who dont
behave. Which doesn't happen often.
-Tim
Uwe Günther wrote:
How does this work, if someone identifies a bug as NO BUG, does somebody
set the status to "Re
So I could set this one to resolved! Thanks Tim.
Some other questions are popping up in my head right now:
- How do you guys to choose which bugs to fix first?
OK there are priorities, you are able to fix some bugs,
others are more difficult to you, some are security
relevant,
- If
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47760
Uwe Günther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/jdbc-pool/
On 09/16/2009 08:57 AM, Gaurav Lohiya wrote:
Hi,
Not sure if this is the right forum to post this question.
I recently heard about the new Tomcat JDBC library, an alternative for the
DBCP lib. We see concurrency issues with the DBCP lib and are despe
It differs by the person. So here is a wild guess ..
But I would guess bugs are usually fixed 1st by interest. For example:
Crap that bug affects my stuff too, I should look at that.
Other bugs are fixed by how interesting they. For example: hmmm .. that
seems odd - I think I'll look at that.
Uwe Günther wrote:
> So I could set this one to resolved! Thanks Tim.
Thank you. Help closing bugs is always much appreciated.
> Some other questions are popping up in my head right now:
>
> - How do you guys to choose which bugs to fix first?
As we say at the ASF - you scratch you own itch. We
So I wasn't so wrong with the first one. Unfortunately there was nothing
to code at all.
So I am gonna go for some odd ones and go on with the good things to do.
How does this work for non commiters; if they have a patch? Ok, 1st
attach the patch to the bug, 2nd...?
--
Kind Regards
Uwe Günth
Uwe Günther wrote:
> So I wasn't so wrong with the first one. Unfortunately there was nothing
> to code at all.
>
> So I am gonna go for some odd ones and go on with the good things to do.
>
> How does this work for non commiters; if they have a patch? Ok, 1st
> attach the patch to the bug, 2nd..
Uwe Günther wrote:
> So I wasn't so wrong with the first one. Unfortunately there was nothing
> to code at all.
>
> So I am gonna go for some odd ones and go on with the good things to do.
>
> How does this work for non commiters; if they have a patch? Ok, 1st
> attach the patch to the bug, 2nd..
Mark Thomas wrote:
Thank you. Help closing bugs is always much appreciated.
Thank you too.
- security bugs (handled on a private list)
- regressions
- things I (or my employer*) care about
- oldest open 5.5.x or 6.0.x bug without a patch
- enhancements
* This only applies during work hours :
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Bugzilla keywords we added for httpd include PatchAvailable (and FAQ and
a few other obvious ones). At httpd, we encourage people to mark the bug
as PatchAvailable as soon as the patch is apparently worth applying. This
provides a quick search for committers who are
Author: bayard
Date: Fri Sep 18 02:32:18 2009
New Revision: 816441
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=816441&view=rev
Log:
Commenting out the list of taglibs. Changing urls to be tomcat.apache.org
except for the Download one which we'll handle later. Hope this doesn't hurt
RDC Rahul.
Modifi
Author: bayard
Date: Fri Sep 18 02:32:49 2009
New Revision: 816442
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=816442&view=rev
Log:
Minor update to text as part of Jakarta->Tomcat
Modified:
tomcat/taglibs/site/src/site/xdoc/site/using.xml
Modified: tomcat/taglibs/site/src/site/xdoc/site/using.xml
Did this go through Mark?
Where do I commit the Taglibs site?
Hen
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 3:59 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Folks,
>
> As part of the response to the recent compromise of ASF servers [1] the
> infrastructure team are introducing a new way to sync web sites from svn
> and are looking
20 matches
Mail list logo
