So I wasn't so wrong with the first one. Unfortunately there was nothing
to code at all.
So I am gonna go for some odd ones and go on with the good things to do.
How does this work for non commiters; if they have a patch? Ok, 1st
attach the patch to the bug, 2nd...?
--
Kind Regards
Uwe Günther
Tim Funk wrote:
It differs by the person. So here is a wild guess ..
But I would guess bugs are usually fixed 1st by interest. For example:
Crap that bug affects my stuff too, I should look at that.
Other bugs are fixed by how interesting they. For example: hmmm .. that
seems odd - I think I'll look at that.
Other bugs are fixed because they are there and its a good thing to do.
I'm not sure about everyone else, but I think the general concensus is
priority is useful in distinguishing enhancement vs bug. But high
priority vs low seems ignored.
Security fixes typically don't go into bugzilla. They are reported
privately to the security list.
-Tim
Uwe Günther wrote:
So I could set this one to resolved! Thanks Tim.
Some other questions are popping up in my head right now:
- How do you guys to choose which bugs to fix first?
OK there are priorities, you are able to fix some bugs,
others are more difficult to you, some are security
relevant, ....
- If you pick up a bug for fixing, do you flag that up
somewhere in Bugzilla?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
