Re: Time to organise svn - Take 3

Mark Thomas wrote: > Mark Thomas wrote: >> svn cp >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_15 >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.1.0/trunk >> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_15 >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk

Re: Time to organise svn - Take 3

jean-frederic clere wrote: > Why Friday? Shouldn't we wait until 6.0.15 (or 6.0.15 + n) is voted stable? We can do if that is the preference. My motivation is that I am keen to get back to a CTR codebase asap as I find only having RTC a real pain. Mark --

Re: Time to organise svn - Take 3

Good point +1 Peter Am 01.11.2007 um 09:51 schrieb jean-frederic clere: Mark Thomas wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_15 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.1.0/trunk https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43588] - Tomcat uses hardcoded 127.0.0.1 for localhost

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Time to organise svn - Take 3

Mark Thomas wrote: jean-frederic clere wrote: Why Friday? Shouldn't we wait until 6.0.15 (or 6.0.15 + n) is voted stable? We can do if that is the preference. My motivation is that I am keen to get back to a CTR codebase asap as I find only having RTC a real pain. he he, I think ev

Re: Time to organise svn - Take 3

Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: > Mark Thomas wrote: >> jean-frederic clere wrote: >> >>> Why Friday? Shouldn't we wait until 6.0.15 (or 6.0.15 + n) is voted >>> stable? >>> >> >> We can do if that is the preference. My motivation is that I am keen >> to get >> back to a CTR codebase asap as

Re: JK 1.2.26 ?

Hi Mitchell, my personal schedule suggests fixing the open things in the week beginning at November, 19th, and then producing a public testing tarball at the end of that week or the weekend around November 25. If the tests go fine, this usually means we'll have a production tarball around Dec. 2,

Re: [Bug 43753] New: - JkEnvVar and Limit of content length HTTP request POST

Hi Ian, I didn't have time to go into it, but thanks for the detailed report. We will fix this before 1.2.26. In case you have a patch to propose, that'll be a good starting point. Regards, Rainer Ian Ward Comfort schrieb: > On Oct 23, 2007, at 2:51 AM, Ian Ward Comfort wrote: >> On Oct 22, 200

RE: Rebuilding isapi_redirect.dll

Tim - One of my colleagues got the build working on his machine. I still couldn't get it working on mine, but at least we've got our new DLL now, which seems to work like a charm. Thanks for your help. -Dan -Original Message- From: Tim Whittington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sund

RE: JK 1.2.26 ?

Rainer - This bug in the AJP protocol / isapi_redirect.dll is one we had to roll our own patch for recently, and it looks like it might have gotten left behind under the "Tomcat 5" product. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42003 This should be a relatively small but impactful c

Re: New tag

Hi Peter, did you read pages from inside the download files, or only follow the link on the automatically generated download page? The latter link points to the public Tomcat docs, so always will show the latest released docs. Inside the downloads, the changelog looks OK (apart from the missing

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43588] - Tomcat uses hardcoded 127.0.0.1 for localhost

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Time to organise svn - Take 3

On Thu, 2007-11-01 at 10:03 +, Mark Thomas wrote: > jean-frederic clere wrote: > > Why Friday? Shouldn't we wait until 6.0.15 (or 6.0.15 + n) is voted > stable? > > We can do if that is the preference. My motivation is that I am keen > to get > back to a CTR codebase asap as I find only having

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43647] - Content-Type changes unexpectedly from text/html to text/plain

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43647] - Content-Type changes unexpectedly from text/html to text/plain

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Time to organise svn - Take 3

jean-frederic clere wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_15 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.1.0/trunk https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_15 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/t

HTTPS from remote client

I have a self-signed certificate (generated with keytool -genkey -alias tomcat -keyalg RSA) and modified my server.xml file to uncomment the connector on port 8443. After restarting tomcat, I can access https://localhost:8443 no problem, but when I try to reach it from a remote computer, it times

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43775] New: - The tomcat6.exe in source download in tar.gz is broken (ok in zip)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Time to organise svn - Take 3

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: jean-frederic clere wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_15 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.1.0/trunk https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_15 https

Re: [Bug 43753] New: - JkEnvVar and Limit of content length HTTP request POST

On Nov 1, 2007, at 7:33 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: I didn't have time to go into it, but thanks for the detailed report. We will fix this before 1.2.26. Great, I'm glad to hear it. In case you have a patch to propose, that'll be a good starting point. Here's one attempt at a patch, which fixes

VirtualHost inheritance (was Re: [Bug 43753] ...)

On Nov 1, 2007, at 8:14 PM, Ian Ward Comfort wrote: Here's one attempt at a patch, which fixes the problem in my limited testing. It modifies the code path as little as possible, since all I know about the intended behavior is what I've gleaned from a cursory audit. In working on this bug

Re: VirtualHost inheritance (was Re: [Bug 43753] ...)

Ian Ward Comfort wrote: I don't know if this is intended behavior, or a bug in mod_jk, or even a bug in Apache, but something seems amiss. Thoughts? Your patch won't work. The real problem is in the initialization for vhosts where when there is *any* Jk directive the create_jk_config is ca

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43647] - Content-Type changes unexpectedly from text/html to text/plain

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: VirtualHost inheritance (was Re: [Bug 43753] ...)

On Nov 2, 2007, at 12:44 AM, Ian Ward Comfort wrote: I can't seem to find the repository location anywhere on the connectors page either... Ah, found it on the Tomcat pages. -- Ian Ward Comfort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> System Administrator, Student Computing, Stanford University

Re: VirtualHost inheritance (was Re: [Bug 43753] ...)

On Nov 2, 2007, at 12:32 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: Ian Ward Comfort wrote: I don't know if this is intended behavior, or a bug in mod_jk, or even a bug in Apache, but something seems amiss. Thoughts? Your patch won't work. No, not for this larger issue. The real problem is in the initializa

Re: VirtualHost inheritance (was Re: [Bug 43753] ...)

On Nov 2, 2007, at 12:18 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: Ian Ward Comfort wrote: I don't know if this is intended behavior, or a bug in mod_jk, or even a bug in Apache, but something seems amiss. Thoughts? Right, this is bug indeed. If there is no Jk... directives the vhost conf is wrongly configured

Re: VirtualHost inheritance (was Re: [Bug 43753] ...)

Ian Ward Comfort wrote: I don't know if this is intended behavior, or a bug in mod_jk, or even a bug in Apache, but something seems amiss. Thoughts? Right, this is bug indeed. If there is no Jk... directives the vhost conf is wrongly configured (seems that merge_jk_config is not evaluated)