William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
svn cp
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_15
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.1.0/trunk
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_15
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk
Changes to .../trunk with be CTR
Changes to .../6.1.x/trunk will be RTC
As per the previously published plan, I will create
tomcat/tc6.1.x/trunk
and tomcat/trunk from the 6.0.15 tag. I plan to do this sometime on
Friday
afternoon GMT.
Why Friday? Shouldn't we wait until 6.0.15 (or 6.0.15 + n) is voted
stable?
Contrawise, why wait, and why a tag? Usually most efforts (in order to
preserve history) branch from trunk or branches, whereas tags/* reflect
an endpoint (end of history). Simply branch from 6.0.x unless there are
dirty secrets buried in there :)
one reason we would wait, is cause there are no ongoing efforts. at
least none that are documented, and as Mark said two months ago,
"I don't see a need for a separate 6.0.x and 6.1.x development at this
point. I have yet to see a convincing technical argument that there is
something sufficiently new and/or different to justify this overhead."
we still haven't documented what this "ongoing effort would be" nor have
we agreed on it.
From what it sounds like right now, and the technical argument and the
reason to get a trunk, would be to have more liberty adding in fixes and
patches,and then have an easier way to propose it back to be a fix in 6.0.
Filip
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
