DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41674] New: - The message "Parse error in default web.xml" is not appropriate.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41675] New: - Add a debug statement when some necessary header information is missing

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

snprintf/vsnprintf in mod_jk

Hi, We have those routines twice (in jk_util.c and jk_status.c). We are also assuming that the platforms always have snprintf() in jk_lb_worker.c for example. In jk_global.h there is: +++ /* There is a snprintf() and vsnprintf() in jk_util.c */ /* if those work remove the #define. */ #if def

org.apache.catalina.util.InstanceSupport.fireInstanceEvent

Hello, I am trying to configure Tomcat to handle very large number (5000) of simultaneous client connections via HTTP with keepalive. All the clients produce equal constant load. The problem is that before I reach maximum CPU load, everythings works fine, clients are served equally with very

Re: org.apache.catalina.util.InstanceSupport.fireInstanceEvent

Dominik Pospisil wrote: So I am thinking if this could not be the problem. Is is necessary to be this implementation synchronized? Given the implementation, you are not supposed to be using instance listeners at this time except for debugging purposes. Since InstanceSupport is array based, I

svn commit: r510474 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/util/InstanceSupport.java

Author: remm Date: Thu Feb 22 04:24:04 2007 New Revision: 510474 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=510474 Log: - Remove sync + clone from InstanceSupport. Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/util/InstanceSupport.java Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/a

svn commit: r510482 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/util/LifecycleSupport.java

Author: remm Date: Thu Feb 22 04:34:36 2007 New Revision: 510482 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=510482 Log: - Remove sync + clone to be consistent. Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/util/LifecycleSupport.java Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apac

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.10

Remy Maucherat wrote: Candidate binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.10/ According to the (slightly) updated release process, the 6.0.10 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ ] Stable So far, there are 3 binding votes for stable (with one from an inactiv

Releasing mod_jk 1.2.21

Hi, I think time as arrive to release 1.2.21. Are there pending changes? Or urgent ugly bugs? What about a date like Friday evening (GMT) for tagging? Cheers Jean-Frederic - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For addit

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.10

I'll give it a whirl. I'm in the process of getting some new servers which can actually run java5. (Thus modernizing me to 2003) -Tim Remy Maucherat wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Candidate binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.10/ According to the (slightl

Re: Releasing mod_jk 1.2.21

Jean-Frederic wrote: Hi, I think time as arrive to release 1.2.21. Are there pending changes? Or urgent ugly bugs? What about a date like Friday evening (GMT) for tagging? I don't think we'll be able to cut that before Monday. There are few pending things that needs to be ported across serve

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.10

Minor (non show stopper) issues: - /manager/html-manager-howto.html is missing - /manager/manager-howto.html is missing - The default welcome page has a bad link to /tomcat-docs instead of docs I'm OK with stable since it looks suitable for production use in many scenarios. -Tim Remy Mauchera

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.10

Remy Maucherat wrote: Candidate binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.10/ According to the (slightly) updated release process, the 6.0.10 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [X] Stable There are some issues with NIO, as well as a CL glitch (which does not

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.10

Tim Funk wrote: Minor (non show stopper) issues: - /manager/html-manager-howto.html is missing - /manager/manager-howto.html is missing I missed that. - The default welcome page has a bad link to /tomcat-docs instead of docs The default page at the moment should be index.html now (not index

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.10

Remy Maucherat wrote: > According to the (slightly) updated release process, the 6.0.10 tag is: > [X] Stable I haven't tested the new features like NIO neither have I noticed the CL issue, you mention in another post so I can't say anything about those parts of 6.0.10. I have stumbled upon som

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.10

Markus Schönhaber wrote: > I have stumbled upon some trivial glitches: One more: all the source codes for the JSP examples (*.jsp.html, *.jspx.html, *.tag.html, *.java.html) seem to be missing. The URLs pointing to them look correct but the files are not there. Regards mks -

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37356] - Tomcat does not invalidate sessions after session-timeout period has passed.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] Release build 5.5.22

Ok folks, for those that want to see the 5.0.22, please provide some feedback. Without votes, I can't push out a release. Filip Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Candidate binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/tomcat/tomcat-5.5/v5.5.22/ According to the (slightly) update

Re: [VOTE] Release build 5.5.22

Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Ok folks, for those that want to see the 5.0.22, please provide some feedback. Without votes, I can't push out a release. [I'm sure you meant 5.5.22, not 5.0.22...] Do votes from non-commiters count in this regard, i.e. in a decisive manner as to whether a relea

Re: [VOTE] Release build 5.5.22

Jess Holle wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Ok folks, for those that want to see the 5.0.22, please provide some feedback. Without votes, I can't push out a release. [I'm sure you meant 5.5.22, not 5.0.22...] Do votes from non-commiters count in this regard, i.e. in a decisive manner as

Re: [VOTE] Release build 5.5.22

I've tested it with my app and it seems to work fine. It's got a couple of things in it that I obviously would like to see. I noticed the warning on the malformed parameter list (I had to ampersands together). Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Jess Holle wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: O

Re: [VOTE] Release build 5.5.22

On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 10:14 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: > Jess Holle wrote: > > Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: > >> Ok folks, for those that want to see the 5.0.22, please provide some > >> feedback. > >> Without votes, I can't push out a release. > > [I'm sure you meant 5.5.22, not 5.0.

Re: [VOTE] Release build 5.5.22

>>> Candidate binaries are available here: >>> http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/tomcat/tomcat-5.5/v5.5.22/ >>> >>> According to the (slightly) updated release process, the 5.5.22 tag is: >>> [ ] Broken >>> [ ] Alpha >>> [ ] Beta >>> [ ] Stable I don't have an extensive test suite. I didn't exerci

svn commit: r510639 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk: java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/NioEndpoint.java java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/SocketProperties.java webapps/docs/config/http.xml

Author: fhanik Date: Thu Feb 22 12:11:50 2007 New Revision: 510639 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=510639 Log: Add in configuration options to control the application buffers associated with a NioChannel Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/NioEndpoin

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41682] New: - ClassCastException with BackupManager + debug logging

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.10

Markus Schönhaber wrote: BTW: Should I open reports in Bugzilla for the things above or would that be an overkill? Those issues come from merging the two examples webapps into one. I think it's ok if you create one bug report listing all these issues. Rémy --

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41684] New: - Some URIs need to be adapted to the changed layout of the stock webapps, some files are missing

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.10

Remy Maucherat wrote: >> According to the (slightly) updated release process, the 6.0.10 tag is: >> [ ] Broken >> [ ] Alpha >> [ ] Beta >> [X] Stable > > So far, there are 3 binding votes for stable (with one from an inactive > committer), and 1 for beta. While a beta or stable release could legal

Re: [VOTE] Release build 5.5.22

Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: > Ok folks, for those that want to see the 5.0.22, please provide some > feedback. > Without votes, I can't push out a release. > > Filip > > Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: >> Candidate binaries are available here: >> http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/tomcat/tomcat-5

svn commit: r510801 - /tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/loader/WebappClassLoader.java

Author: markt Date: Thu Feb 22 20:09:46 2007 New Revision: 510801 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=510801 Log: Port Remy's CL deadlock quick fix from TC6 Modified: tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/loader/WebappClassLoader.java Modified: tomcat/c

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41686] New: - Error logging at startup is unusable

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu