On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 10:14 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: > Jess Holle wrote: > > Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: > >> Ok folks, for those that want to see the 5.0.22, please provide some > >> feedback. > >> Without votes, I can't push out a release. > > [I'm sure you meant 5.5.22, not 5.0.22...] > > > > Do votes from non-commiters count in this regard, i.e. in a decisive > > manner as to whether a release is pushed out? > The feedback from non-committers is definitely take into account, as > more testing proves better for our releases. > so this is something we do encourage
I myself haven't run into any issues with it. It's been available on ~arch(unstable) Gentoo to install since the day it was announced. Although I have no way of telling if anyone has installed/emerged 5.5.22 or not. No bugs have been reported ;) I ran it for a bit on my development server, but then switched back to 6.0.10. Not for any reason other than preference. Also might be best on a new thread, but will 5.5.22 ship with ecj 3.1 or 3.2? I have upped the package on Gentoo to use 3.2, since we are trying to get rid of 3.1. -- William L. Thomson Jr. Gentoo/Java
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
