Re: Tagging 1.2.22

diff to our last candidate and simple build on Solaris look good :) Mladen Turk wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: Hi, The quality check release was out few days ago. Hi there is new quality check release available from: http://people.apache.org/~mturk/jk-1.2.22-dev/ It contains few minor fixes most

Re: Tagging 1.2.22

Hi, > Hi there is new quality check release available from: > http://people.apache.org/~mturk/jk-1.2.22-dev/ > It contains few minor fixes mostly for documentation > and release script (owner/group for .tar) > I'll give it 24 hours before making a tag for any > last minute checks. +1 for NetWare,

Re: Tagging 1.2.22

Mladen Turk wrote: Hi, The quality check release was out few days ago. Hi there is new quality check release available from: http://people.apache.org/~mturk/jk-1.2.22-dev/ It contains few minor fixes mostly for documentation and release script (owner/group for .tar) I'll give it 24 hours bef

Re: Tagging 1.2.22

Hi Rainer, > - Fix whitespace in Netware make file non-important, was more a test that commit works again; please drop from the list. Guenter. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: Tagging 1.2.22

Hi Mladen, thanks for your comments, and I totally agree with everything :) Regards, Rainer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Tagging 1.2.22

Rainer Jung wrote: 1) Things to add to the changelog = I added few. Some of them are waste of resource IMHO ;) I found the following changes, which are missing in the change log. Not all of them need to go there, but maybe Mladen, Jean-Frederic, Guenter and

Re: Tagging 1.2.22

I only did some changes to the docs and very small and non risky changes to code. I tested with apache 2.0.59 prefork and worker on Linux SLES 9 SP 2 64 Bit AMD. Tests looked OK. Some comments: 1) Things to add to the changelog = I found the following changes, wh

Re: Tagging 1.2.22

On Apr 6, 2007, at 10:24 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: On Apr 5, 2007, at 9:53 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: Jim Jagielski wrote: The quality check release was out few days ago. I plan to tag the mod_jk tomorrow morning Europe time. Any objections? This is a "holiday" weekend, so maybe afterwards?

Re: Tagging 1.2.22

I got some more information from IBM labs and it seems there is something weird in our #ifdef AS400 and #ifndef AS400 which make sent_bodycnt reset whereas we got a body and so disturb jk when HTTP 500 (for example SOAP fault). I'll check that next week but dont stop the release for this 2007/4/

Re: Tagging 1.2.22

On Apr 5, 2007, at 9:53 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: Jim Jagielski wrote: The quality check release was out few days ago. I plan to tag the mod_jk tomorrow morning Europe time. Any objections? This is a "holiday" weekend, so maybe afterwards? OK, so the schedule is then for Tuesday May 10th.

Re: Tagging 1.2.22

Jim Jagielski wrote: The quality check release was out few days ago. I plan to tag the mod_jk tomorrow morning Europe time. Any objections? This is a "holiday" weekend, so maybe afterwards? OK, so the schedule is then for Tuesday May 10th. Regards, Mladen.

Re: Tagging 1.2.22

On Apr 5, 2007, at 6:17 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: Hi, The quality check release was out few days ago. I plan to tag the mod_jk tomorrow morning Europe time. Any objections? This is a "holiday" weekend, so maybe afterwards? -

Re: Tagging 1.2.22

Hi Mladen, I only had time to do a quick line endings test for Apache/Win and a short compilation test. I would love to use the holiday tomorrow to check the commits done during the last three weeks. I wouldn't block a release, but if you could move it a little I would be able to commit at le

Tagging 1.2.22

Hi, The quality check release was out few days ago. I plan to tag the mod_jk tomorrow morning Europe time. Any objections? Regards, Mladen. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PR