Re: Remove the jni worker from mod_jk

2009-03-05 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Mar 5, 2009, at 4:36 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: Rainer Jung wrote: On 05.03.2009 10:03, Mark Thomas wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: I stumbled across some code in trunk for this. I had a poke around and as far as I can tell this hasn't been supported for quite some time. What

Re: Remove the jni worker from mod_jk

2009-03-05 Thread Mladen Turk
Costin Manolache wrote: Please go ahead and remove it. 10 years ago it seemed a good idea to avoid the IPC. Now it seems even running them on the same machine is obsolete. LOL. But don't forget the good old one ... What goes around, comes around Cheers -- ^(TM) --

Re: Remove the jni worker from mod_jk

2009-03-05 Thread Henri Gomez
> Please go ahead and remove it. > 10 years ago it seemed a good idea to avoid the IPC. Now it seems even > running them > on the same machine is obsolete. +1 The simpler the better and we're in cloud computing today :) - To uns

Re: Remove the jni worker from mod_jk

2009-03-05 Thread Costin Manolache
Please go ahead and remove it. 10 years ago it seemed a good idea to avoid the IPC. Now it seems even running them on the same machine is obsolete. Costin On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 1:03 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > Mladen Turk wrote: > > Mark Thomas wrote: > >> I stumbled across some code in trunk for

Re: Remove the jni worker from mod_jk

2009-03-05 Thread Rainer Jung
On 05.03.2009 10:36, Mladen Turk wrote: Rainer Jung wrote: On 05.03.2009 10:03, Mark Thomas wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: I stumbled across some code in trunk for this. I had a poke around and as far as I can tell this hasn't been supported for quite some time. What do people t

Re: Remove the jni worker from mod_jk

2009-03-05 Thread Mladen Turk
Rainer Jung wrote: On 05.03.2009 10:03, Mark Thomas wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: I stumbled across some code in trunk for this. I had a poke around and as far as I can tell this hasn't been supported for quite some time. What do people think about removing it from mod_jk and tr

Re: Remove the jni worker from mod_jk

2009-03-05 Thread Rainer Jung
On 05.03.2009 10:03, Mark Thomas wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: I stumbled across some code in trunk for this. I had a poke around and as far as I can tell this hasn't been supported for quite some time. What do people think about removing it from mod_jk and trunk? It is already

Re: Remove the jni worker from mod_jk

2009-03-05 Thread Mark Thomas
Mladen Turk wrote: > Mark Thomas wrote: >> I stumbled across some code in trunk for this. I had a poke around and >> as far as >> I can tell this hasn't been supported for quite some time. What do >> people think >> about removing it from mod_jk and trunk? >> > > It is already disabled by default.

Re: Remove the jni worker from mod_jk

2009-03-05 Thread Mladen Turk
Mark Thomas wrote: I stumbled across some code in trunk for this. I had a poke around and as far as I can tell this hasn't been supported for quite some time. What do people think about removing it from mod_jk and trunk? It is already disabled by default. You need a special configure flag --en

Re: Remove the jni worker from mod_jk

2009-03-05 Thread Rainer Jung
On 05.03.2009 09:23, Mark Thomas wrote: I stumbled across some code in trunk for this. I had a poke around and as far as I can tell this hasn't been supported for quite some time. What do people think about removing it from mod_jk and trunk? It is very unlikely, that it still works (although I

Remove the jni worker from mod_jk

2009-03-05 Thread Mark Thomas
I stumbled across some code in trunk for this. I had a poke around and as far as I can tell this hasn't been supported for quite some time. What do people think about removing it from mod_jk and trunk? Mark - To unsubscribe, e-m