Re: Releasing mod_jk 1.2.21

2007-02-26 Thread Mladen Turk
Jim Jagielski wrote: On Feb 23, 2007, at 1:10 PM, Jean-Frederic wrote: I also have the pending patch... To prevent typos in the properties no beeing detected what starting httpd. Should I include it? Sorry for the delay... unless it's too late, why the change from HTTP_INTERNAL_SERVER_ERR

Re: Releasing mod_jk 1.2.21

2007-02-26 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Feb 23, 2007, at 1:10 PM, Jean-Frederic wrote: I also have the pending patch... To prevent typos in the properties no beeing detected what starting httpd. Should I include it? Sorry for the delay... unless it's too late, why the change from HTTP_INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR to !OK? ---

Re: Releasing mod_jk 1.2.21

2007-02-23 Thread Mladen Turk
Rainer Jung wrote: and we will get a lot of bug reports, if we break those. So I think all in all we should only check attributes beginning with "worker.". Right, good point. After all this is what matters. Regards, Mladen. ---

Re: Releasing mod_jk 1.2.21

2007-02-23 Thread Rainer Jung
I like it too. It was always a weakness, that workers.properties typos get through unnoticed. It will be interesting to find out that way, how many users have configs that actually don't work... I didn't read the patch in detail: will it be compatible with the existing macro feature myvar=someVal

Re: Releasing mod_jk 1.2.21

2007-02-23 Thread Mladen Turk
Jean-Frederic wrote: I also have the pending patch... To prevent typos in the properties no beeing detected what starting httpd. Should I include it? Looks like a good feature for unexperienced admins :) +1 Regards, Mladen. --

Re: Releasing mod_jk 1.2.21

2007-02-23 Thread Jean-Frederic
I also have the pending patch... To prevent typos in the properties no beeing detected what starting httpd. Should I include it? Cheers Jean-Frederic Index: apache-1.3/mod_jk.c === --- apache-1.3/mod_jk.c (revision 510645) +++ apac

Re: Releasing mod_jk 1.2.21

2007-02-23 Thread Mladen Turk
Rainer Jung wrote: Yes, but then you ignore the fact, that we already have such a functionality, and that we changed it's behaviour between 1.2.19 and 1.2.20. So at least we need to decide, if it's behaviour should be - disabled completely (breaking existing configs for all versions) My fa

Re: Releasing mod_jk 1.2.21

2007-02-23 Thread Mladen Turk
Rainer Jung wrote: Jean-Frederic wrote: On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 09:20 +0100, Rainer Jung wrote: What is still open: A Henri's core dumps on iSeries Wasn't it only a wrong printf? I doubt that very much, at the stack in his core didn't point to these statements. I'm still waiting for feedbac

Re: Releasing mod_jk 1.2.21

2007-02-23 Thread Rainer Jung
Mladen Turk wrote: Rainer Jung wrote: D New design of interaction of mod_jk ForwardDirectories and httpd DirectoryIndex (BZ 41430, BZ 36121) As I said so many times, any attempt to from DirectoryIndex that will force serving something that is not part of the Tomcat's welcome file list will b

Re: Releasing mod_jk 1.2.21

2007-02-23 Thread Rainer Jung
Jean-Frederic wrote: On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 09:20 +0100, Rainer Jung wrote: What is still open: A Henri's core dumps on iSeries Wasn't it only a wrong printf? I doubt that very much, at the stack in his core didn't point to these statements. I'm still waiting for feedback from Henri. B T

Re: Releasing mod_jk 1.2.21

2007-02-23 Thread Rainer Jung
Mladen Turk wrote: Rainer Jung wrote: What is still open: I would like to give A-C a chance until end of the week and would then This week or a next? We have a Security issue that requires release ASAP. This week. I would be interested in the Security issue. If appropriate use direct co

Re: Releasing mod_jk 1.2.21

2007-02-23 Thread Mladen Turk
Rainer Jung wrote: D New design of interaction of mod_jk ForwardDirectories and httpd DirectoryIndex (BZ 41430, BZ 36121) As I said so many times, any attempt to from DirectoryIndex that will force serving something that is not part of the Tomcat's welcome file list will be vetoed. I would s

Re: Releasing mod_jk 1.2.21

2007-02-23 Thread Mladen Turk
Jean-Frederic wrote: C Porting 41439 from IIS to Apache You want to remove sessionid=D5E2FE08F02400159DFD6231 11F98FEE.p-ng-ptom2 from /shoppingcc/img/btn_nav_main_login.gif;jsessionid=D5E2FE08F02400159DFD6231 11F98FEE.p-ng-ptom2 do it with mod_rewrite: RewriteRule ^/(.*).gif;jsessionid=.*$ /$

Re: Releasing mod_jk 1.2.21

2007-02-23 Thread Jean-Frederic
On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 09:20 +0100, Rainer Jung wrote: > What is still open: > > A Henri's core dumps on iSeries Wasn't it only a wrong printf? > B The other user with protocol corruption on AIX for worker MPM Is there are bugzilla number for this one? > C Porting 41439 from IIS to Apache You

Re: Releasing mod_jk 1.2.21

2007-02-23 Thread Mladen Turk
Rainer Jung wrote: What is still open: I would like to give A-C a chance until end of the week and would then This week or a next? We have a Security issue that requires release ASAP. Regards, Mladen. - To unsubscribe, e-m

Re: Releasing mod_jk 1.2.21

2007-02-23 Thread Rainer Jung
What is still open: A Henri's core dumps on iSeries B The other user with protocol corruption on AIX for worker MPM C Porting 41439 from IIS to Apache and maybe D New design of interaction of mod_jk ForwardDirectories and httpd DirectoryIndex (BZ 41430, BZ 36121) E BZ 41330/40310 F Investigat

Re: Releasing mod_jk 1.2.21

2007-02-22 Thread Mladen Turk
Jean-Frederic wrote: Hi, I think time as arrive to release 1.2.21. Are there pending changes? Or urgent ugly bugs? What about a date like Friday evening (GMT) for tagging? I don't think we'll be able to cut that before Monday. There are few pending things that needs to be ported across serve

Releasing mod_jk 1.2.21

2007-02-22 Thread Jean-Frederic
Hi, I think time as arrive to release 1.2.21. Are there pending changes? Or urgent ugly bugs? What about a date like Friday evening (GMT) for tagging? Cheers Jean-Frederic - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For addit