I like it too. It was always a weakness, that workers.properties typos get through unnoticed. It will be interesting to find out that way, how many users have configs that actually don't work...
I didn't read the patch in detail: will it be compatible with the existing macro feature myvar=someValue worker.something.attribute=$(myvar) There are zillions of old default config files including the deprecated ps=/ ... (it's even still in our docs) and we will get a lot of bug reports, if we break those. So I think all in all we should only check attributes beginning with "worker.". Regards, Rainer Mladen Turk schrieb: > Jean-Frederic wrote: >> I also have the pending patch... To prevent typos in the properties no >> beeing detected what starting httpd. >> >> Should I include it? >> > > Looks like a good feature for unexperienced admins :) > +1 > > Regards, > Mladen. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
