What we and user need, is a real plugin and tool contribution area.
+1 to start the modules plugin system to create more value of the
tomcat project
regards,
Peter
Am 07.02.2009 um 01:18 schrieb Costin Manolache:
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Remy Maucherat
wrote:
On Fri, 2009-02-
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 14:59 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> > that discussion does exist if you look back into the archives
> > what has changed since then?
>
> The proposed module layout looks so-so to me, and apparently others feel
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 14:59 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> that discussion does exist if you look back into the archives
> what has changed since then?
The proposed module layout looks so-so to me, and apparently others feel
the same, so a solution is to remove the modules.
Rémy
-
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 10:37 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
ASF is community over code, its hard to grow the community if you never
add any code.
Tomcat JDBC would actually make TC 7 even more light weight since it is
smaller than DBCP.
Tomcat JDBC is not experime
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 10:37 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> ASF is community over code, its hard to grow the community if you never
> add any code.
> Tomcat JDBC would actually make TC 7 even more light weight since it is
> smaller than DBCP.
> Tomcat JDBC is not experimental either, its
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 17:44 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
I would suggest
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/
- site
- tc6.0.x
- trunk
- modules <-- ADD THIS
- jdbc-pool
- trunk
- tags
- branches
- bayeux
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 5:14 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 17:44 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> > I would suggest
> >
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/
> > - site
> > - tc6.0.x
> > - trunk
> > - modules <-- ADD THIS
> > - jdbc-pool
>
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 17:44 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> I would suggest
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/
> - site
> - tc6.0.x
> - trunk
> - modules <-- ADD THIS
> - jdbc-pool
> - trunk
> - tags
> - branches
> - bayeux
> -
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> that would work for me, then the tag name could differentiate the module
> itself
Sounds good. The connectors use a similar approach so you'd have
asf/tomcat/tags/JDBC_POOL_0_0_1 or whatever.
Mark
>
> Filip
>
> Mark Thomas wrote:
>> How about adding .../tomcat/
that would work for me, then the tag name could differentiate the module
itself
Filip
Mark Thomas wrote:
How about adding .../tomcat/tags ?
Mark
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
It's getting spaghetti... If you really have to - no need to add
'modules' -
just
How about adding .../tomcat/tags ?
Mark
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> Costin Manolache wrote:
>> It's getting spaghetti... If you really have to - no need to add
>> 'modules' -
>> just have them top-level ( i.e. under asf/tomcat ).
>>
> spaghetti is historical, all the directories from our
Costin Manolache wrote:
It's getting spaghetti... If you really have to - no need to add 'modules' -
just have them top-level ( i.e. under asf/tomcat ).
spaghetti is historical, all the directories from our older versions.
this really boils down to dependencies.
with the change in trunk to co
It's getting spaghetti... If you really have to - no need to add 'modules' -
just have them top-level ( i.e. under asf/tomcat ).
What prevents you from tagging ? Tag is cheap AFAIK - just tag the entire
trunk.
I personally hate working with many small repos. I understand the need when
you want di
13 matches
Mail list logo
