On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Remy Maucherat <r...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 14:59 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: > > that discussion does exist if you look back into the archives > > what has changed since then? > > The proposed module layout looks so-so to me, and apparently others feel > the same, so a solution is to remove the modules. Can we just leave the modules as they are - it really doesn't matter that much. Tagging is possible ( just tag the whole tree ), release is possible. The question of scope remains - but I see no problem with having a tomcat-specific jdbc pool or other components ( like we have juli and many other things that could fit commons better ), it it is maintained ( which makes it quite simple - if code is maintained mostly by tomcat, why not leave it in tomcat ? ) I'm going to push the lite 'module' as well - modules dir seems a good middle ground. Costin
