If the Random number generator is "sufficiently random" could we avoid
the digesting? Or should it be an option?
Since java1.6 has SecureRandom - is its current implementation good
enough to avoid all the extra tricks currently being done and we can
just use that as a default? [Or maybe - we s
On 18/11/2010 13:01, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> On 11/18/2010 01:45 PM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
>> On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 18:06 +, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: markt
>>> Date: Wed Nov 17 18:06:20 2010
>>> New Revision: 1036150
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1036150&view=rev
On 18/11/2010 12:45, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 18:06 +, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Wed Nov 17 18:06:20 2010
>> New Revision: 1036150
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1036150&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Add recent performance improvements to changelo
On 11/18/2010 01:45 PM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 18:06 +, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Wed Nov 17 18:06:20 2010
>> New Revision: 1036150
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1036150&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Add recent performance improvements to chang
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 18:06 +, ma...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Wed Nov 17 18:06:20 2010
> New Revision: 1036150
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1036150&view=rev
> Log:
> Add recent performance improvements to changelog
Ok.
So we have two queues that can essentially
