On 18/11/2010 13:01, jean-frederic clere wrote: > On 11/18/2010 01:45 PM, Remy Maucherat wrote: >> On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 18:06 +0000, ma...@apache.org wrote: >>> Author: markt >>> Date: Wed Nov 17 18:06:20 2010 >>> New Revision: 1036150 >>> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1036150&view=rev >>> Log: >>> Add recent performance improvements to changelog >> >> Ok. >> >> So we have two queues that can essentially grow up to the thread count, >> right ?. You have chosen to not use thread locals though (they would >> most likely perform better, at the cost of more memory). Any testing ? >> >> Another question: is it safe on all platforms to concurrently read >> uramdom from a single process ? I suppose it is probably safe, but do we >> know for sure ? > > For info: http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/11/27/113
Thanks. Interesting thread. My reading of that thread is: - this should always have worked - it didn't - it was fixed ~6 years ago for 2.6 kernels That is good enough for me. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
