On 21.10.2010 21:21, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 10/21/2010 09:16 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 21.10.2010 20:50, Mladen Turk wrote:
OK?
OK :)
Let's put this to the end.
Peace. I hope it works now as expected.
Do you have anything to add to the changelog?
Regards,
Rainer
On 10/21/2010 09:16 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 21.10.2010 20:50, Mladen Turk wrote:
OK?
OK :)
Let's put this to the end.
Regards
--
^TM
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-
On 21.10.2010 20:50, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 21/10/2010 20:33, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 21.10.2010 19:12, Mladen Turk wrote:
It means that we won't have
jk-1.2.31 but jk-1.2.31-rSomething even for a release?
You mean "It means we won't have?" or "It means we will have?" Guess
it's a typo.
Well
On 21/10/2010 20:36, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 21.10.2010 20:01, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 10/21/2010 06:52 PM, rj...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rjung
-#define JK_EXPOSED_VERSION JK_EXPOSED_VERSION_INT
+#define JK_EXPOSED_VERSION JK_EXPOSED_VERSION_INT JK_REVISION
Ok, it seems I have to do it offici
On 21/10/2010 20:33, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 21.10.2010 19:12, Mladen Turk wrote:
It means that we won't have
jk-1.2.31 but jk-1.2.31-rSomething even for a release?
You mean "It means we won't have?" or "It means we will have?" Guess it's a
typo.
Well, I meant we wont have just mod_jk-1.2.3
On 21.10.2010 20:01, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 10/21/2010 06:52 PM, rj...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rjung
-#define JK_EXPOSED_VERSION JK_EXPOSED_VERSION_INT
+#define JK_EXPOSED_VERSION JK_EXPOSED_VERSION_INT JK_REVISION
Ok, it seems I have to do it officially, so here it is:
-1 veto
Please rever
On 21.10.2010 19:12, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 10/21/2010 06:52 PM, rj...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rjung
/* Source Control Revision as a suffix, e.g. "-r12345" */
-#define JK_REVISION ""
+#define JK_REVISION "$Revision$"
/** END OF AREA TO MODIFY BEFORE RELEASING */
@@ -65
On 10/21/2010 06:52 PM, rj...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rjung
-#define JK_EXPOSED_VERSION JK_EXPOSED_VERSION_INT
+#define JK_EXPOSED_VERSION JK_EXPOSED_VERSION_INT JK_REVISION
Ok, it seems I have to do it officially, so here it is:
-1 veto
Please revert adding this to the exposed version.
(or a
On 10/21/2010 06:52 PM, rj...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rjung
/* Source Control Revision as a suffix, e.g. "-r12345" */
-#define JK_REVISION ""
+#define JK_REVISION "$Revision$"
/** END OF AREA TO MODIFY BEFORE RELEASING */
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@
#if (JK_VERRC != 0)
#
