On 21/10/2010 20:33, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 21.10.2010 19:12, Mladen Turk wrote:
It means that we won't have
jk-1.2.31 but jk-1.2.31-rSomething even for a release?
You mean "It means we won't have?" or "It means we will have?" Guess it's a
typo.
Well, I meant we wont have just mod_jk-1.2.31 but rather
something like mod_jk-1.2.31$Revision: 123456789 $
Please.
It is intended as "1.2.31 (xyz)" where xyz is the numeric revision.
First it doesn't look like that. Second, what does it mean
from the users point of view.
Why not? It doesn't find its way into the tarball names etc.
But it does on ServerTokens full, in the logs, etc...
This is a real mess.
Again I really see what is the *problem* you are trying to solve?
It's a complete mistery for me.
Regards
--
^TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
