Re: renaming jar files

2008-03-23 Thread Bill Barker
"Phil Steitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Costin Manolache wrote: >> > I understand people using JDBC authenticator would miss the connection >> > pooling - but maybe they could download

Re: renaming jar files

2008-03-23 Thread Phil Steitz
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Costin Manolache wrote: > > I understand people using JDBC authenticator would miss the connection > > pooling - but maybe they could download it separately ? Would't be > > easier to just download the 'official' version ?

Re: renaming jar files

2008-03-23 Thread Mark Thomas
Costin Manolache wrote: I understand people using JDBC authenticator would miss the connection pooling - but maybe they could download it separately ? Would't be easier to just download the 'official' version ? No. commons-dbcp supports far more than just pooling for the JDBC authenticator. Th

Re: renaming jar files

2008-03-22 Thread Costin Manolache
> > Speaking of deps - I'm completely confused by tomcat-dbcp.jar - it > > seems to break the build ( 'download' ) with JDK1.6, yet I can't find > > > > that's because DBCP implements interfaces, and only implements the > java.sql/javax.sql up to JDK 1.5. > > > any usage in the code - and just r

Re: renaming jar files

2008-03-21 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
Costin Manolache wrote: What's the current status of commons-logging versus juli/logging ? Do we still need the dep ? in 5.5 we still support commoons logging, in 6.0, no more unless you build the adapter from the extras package Speaking of deps - I'm completely confused by tomcat-dbcp.jar -

Re: renaming jar files

2008-03-20 Thread Costin Manolache
What's the current status of commons-logging versus juli/logging ? Do we still need the dep ? Speaking of deps - I'm completely confused by tomcat-dbcp.jar - it seems to break the build ( 'download' ) with JDK1.6, yet I can't find any usage in the code - and just removing it doesn't seem to hurt i