On 02/06/2010 14:23, buddhika chamith wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> I prefer separate MBeans since it would help to keep base interfaces clean.
OK. Works for me. Keep the MBeans in the separate package that already
exists.
Mark
-
To
Hi Mark,
I prefer separate MBeans since it would help to keep base interfaces clean.
Regards
On 28/05/2010 04:22, buddhika chamith wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> As far as I feel additional methods in the base class may tend to bloat the
> base interface unnecessarily. Some of the methods are not generic so that
> they cannot be included in the base interface as well. On the other hand
> using sep
Hi Mark,
As far as I feel additional methods in the base class may tend to bloat the
base interface unnecessarily. Some of the methods are not generic so that
they cannot be included in the base interface as well. On the other hand
using separate MBeans avoids these issues. Additional methods can
On 26/05/2010 11:40, buddhika chamith wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
>
>> *Class: StandardWrapper*
>>>
>>>
>>> Method :
>>> add/removeLifeCycleListener(org.apache.catalina.LifecycleListener)
>>> Suggestion : Remove the methods since the method can be provided in a
>>> generic way with only
Hi Mark,
> *Class: StandardWrapper*
>>
>>
>> Method :
>> add/removeLifeCycleListener(org.apache.catalina.LifecycleListener)
>> Suggestion : Remove the methods since the method can be provided in a
>> generic way with only involving primitives.
>>
>
> Again, I don't get what you m
On 23/05/2010 04:57, buddhika chamith wrote:
Hi All,
It seems that o.a.Catalina.Core MBeans descriptor has got operations
containing POJO objects instead of primitive types which make them
inaccessible via JConsole.
I suggest the following to avoid this situation. Any comments and
suggestions ar
