On 26/05/2010 11:40, buddhika chamith wrote: > Hi Mark, > > >> *Class: StandardWrapper* >>> >>> >>> Method : >>> add/removeLifeCycleListener(org.apache.catalina.LifecycleListener) >>> Suggestion : Remove the methods since the method can be provided in a >>> generic way with only involving primitives. >>> >> >> Again, I don't get what you mean here. >> >> > Here what I meant was that we cannot use a primitive type parameterized > method in the place of LifecycleListener object. But if we go with oname it > may be possible thus offloading the creation of LifecycleListener to > MBeanFactory etc.
Understood. That brings us back to the choice between: - adding additional methods that use oname to the existing classes - using separate MBean classes What are you thoughts on the pros and cons of these approaches? Or is there another option? Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
