On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 3:35 PM Konstantin Kolinko
wrote:
>
> пт, 28 апр. 2023 г. в 16:21, Konstantin Kolinko :
> >
> > чт, 27 апр. 2023 г. в 19:34, Mark Thomas :
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > As part of a discussion around a Spring Boot issue [1], the question has
> > > been raised whether ther
пт, 28 апр. 2023 г. в 16:21, Konstantin Kolinko :
>
> чт, 27 апр. 2023 г. в 19:34, Mark Thomas :
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > As part of a discussion around a Spring Boot issue [1], the question has
> > been raised whether there is merit in moving the Utility executor
> > start/stop from StandardServer
чт, 27 апр. 2023 г. в 19:34, Mark Thomas :
>
> Hi all,
>
> As part of a discussion around a Spring Boot issue [1], the question has
> been raised whether there is merit in moving the Utility executor
> start/stop from StandardServer init/destroy to start/stop.
>
> I've looked at the code and I don'
Hi Team,
Its quite awesome discussion to easy the tomcat as proc
I will say it's background compatible since then we added background active
element
StartStop both are in the hand of separate module
Spring Boot is already doing this as tomcat working as in background so it
will boost tomcat wil
Le ven. 28 avr. 2023 à 11:55, Rémy Maucherat a écrit :
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 9:02 AM Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
> >
> > Le ven. 28 avr. 2023 à 08:36, Rémy Maucherat a écrit :
> >
> > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 8:10 AM Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > Guess
On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 9:02 AM Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
>
> Le ven. 28 avr. 2023 à 08:36, Rémy Maucherat a écrit :
>
> > On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 8:10 AM Romain Manni-Bucau
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > Guess this utility should be there very early so before other
> > starts/stops
> > >
Le ven. 28 avr. 2023 à 08:36, Rémy Maucherat a écrit :
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 8:10 AM Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > Guess this utility should be there very early so before other
> starts/stops
> > sounds good but ultimately init/destroy is better since it avoids to
> create
>
> On Apr 28, 2023, at 14:35, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 8:10 AM Romain Manni-Bucau
> mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Guess this utility should be there very early so before other starts/stops
>> sounds good but ultimately init/destroy is better sinc
On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 8:10 AM Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Guess this utility should be there very early so before other starts/stops
> sounds good but ultimately init/destroy is better since it avoids to create
> custom utility threads in subcomponents init/destroy (more destroy for rea
Hi
Guess this utility should be there very early so before other starts/stops
sounds good but ultimately init/destroy is better since it avoids to create
custom utility threads in subcomponents init/destroy (more destroy for real
cases I think, not sure for init).
What about getting it injected f
> On Apr 28, 2023, at 00:33, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> As part of a discussion around a Spring Boot issue [1], the question has been
> raised whether there is merit in moving the Utility executor start/stop from
> StandardServer init/destroy to start/stop.
>
> I've looked at the c
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 6:34 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> As part of a discussion around a Spring Boot issue [1], the question has
> been raised whether there is merit in moving the Utility executor
> start/stop from StandardServer init/destroy to start/stop.
>
> I've looked at the code a
12 matches
Mail list logo
