Mark,
On 11/13/14 11:07 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 13/11/2014 16:01, Andrew Carr wrote:
>> Mark,
>>
>> I previously voted on the severity of this issue in bugzilla.
>>
>> You looking for verification of the fix and the vote here? Just trying to
>> clarify.
>>
>> +1 on 56780 fix
>
> Thanks.
>
>
Thank you Mark, I will test it.
Andrew
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 13/11/2014 16:06, Andrew Carr wrote:
> > I see, I guess, in the svn history where your comments are votes, and
> there
> > is +1 / -1 in the status.txt file. So I would have to be a committer to
>
On 13/11/2014 16:06, Andrew Carr wrote:
> I see, I guess, in the svn history where your comments are votes, and there
> is +1 / -1 in the status.txt file. So I would have to be a committer to
> vote then?
You need to be a committer for your vote to be binding (and to record it
in the status file)
apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 11:07 AM
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: Re: Tomcat 6.0.x release
>
> On 13/11/2014 16:01, Andrew Carr wrote:
>> Mark,
>>
>> I previously voted on the severity of this issue in bugzilla.
>>
>> Y
Will this include the latest Tomcat Native source as well?
-Rob
From: Mark Thomas [ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 11:07 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 6.0.x release
On 13/11/2014 16:01, Andrew Carr wrote:
> M
I see, I guess, in the svn history where your comments are votes, and there
is +1 / -1 in the status.txt file. So I would have to be a committer to
vote then?
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Andrew Carr
wrote:
> Mark,
>
> I previously voted on the severity of this issue in bugzilla.
>
> You l
On 13/11/2014 16:01, Andrew Carr wrote:
> Mark,
>
> I previously voted on the severity of this issue in bugzilla.
>
> You looking for verification of the fix and the vote here? Just trying to
> clarify.
>
> +1 on 56780 fix
Thanks.
6.0.x uses RTC (Review-Then-Commit). Every proposed change is
Mark,
I previously voted on the severity of this issue in bugzilla.
You looking for verification of the fix and the vote here? Just trying to
clarify.
+1 on 56780 fix
Andrew
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 4:29 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We need one more vote for the fix for 56780 in 6.0.x.
>
