Hola,
> I strongly disagree that the current documentation format is helpful
> both in terms of readability and accessibility to update.
>
> For about 2 years now I have wanted to do something with them, but never
> get around to it
Show me a system that gives me the same convenience as n
and the
r pure XHTML with CSS.
Allistair
-Original Message-
From: Ian Darwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 April 2006 20:32
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: TC6 documentation
Yoav Shapira wrote:
> There were other reasons for using XML, like the ability for Jakarta
> to have some commo
Hola,
> Right you are, thanks. And am I right that eating our own dog food -
> using JSP tags for that - is out because we want to maintain
> statically-usable copies?
Yes, you're right. The docs is indexed, searched all over the place,
people bookmark their local docs, etc, etc.
> OTOH it mig
Yoav Shapira wrote:
There were other reasons for using XML, like the ability for Jakarta
to have some common elements that would get automagically resolved
into the bug tracking URLs, etc. For example, when I edit the
changelog it's great to just put in n and have it be
resolved to the proper Bu
There were other reasons for using XML, like the ability for Jakarta
to have some common elements that would get automagically resolved
into the bug tracking URLs, etc. For example, when I edit the
changelog it's great to just put in n and have it be
resolved to the proper Bugzilla link URL. I th
