Re: Release JK 1.2.34

2012-03-19 Thread Mladen Turk
On 03/19/2012 04:18 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: Do you have any template for that? Sorry no. Maybe something like: Send... Thanks -- ^TM - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-ma

Re: Release JK 1.2.34

2012-03-19 Thread Christopher Schultz
Mladen, On 3/19/12 10:48 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: > I'd appreciate if you can check the httpd builds from trunk > since I concentrated mainly on IIS. As mentioned in BZ, trunk from today builds and works remarkably better than 1.2.33 in my environment: no crashes, warnings, etc. I've got it running

Re: Release JK 1.2.34

2012-03-19 Thread Mark Thomas
On 19/03/2012 15:07, Mladen Turk wrote: > On 03/19/2012 03:57 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: >> On 19/03/2012 14:55, Mark Thomas wrote: >>> On 19/03/2012 14:48, Mladen Turk wrote: Hi, I plan to tag 1.2.34 tomorrow cause we have one regression and few long lasting bugs fixed. I

Re: Release JK 1.2.34

2012-03-19 Thread Mladen Turk
On 03/19/2012 03:57 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: On 19/03/2012 14:55, Mark Thomas wrote: On 19/03/2012 14:48, Mladen Turk wrote: Hi, I plan to tag 1.2.34 tomorrow cause we have one regression and few long lasting bugs fixed. I'd appreciate if you can check the httpd builds from trunk since I concen

Re: Release JK 1.2.34

2012-03-19 Thread Mark Thomas
On 19/03/2012 14:55, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 19/03/2012 14:48, Mladen Turk wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I plan to tag 1.2.34 tomorrow cause we have one regression >> and few long lasting bugs fixed. >> >> I'd appreciate if you can check the httpd builds from trunk >> since I concentrated mainly on IIS. >> >

Re: Release JK 1.2.34

2012-03-19 Thread Mark Thomas
On 19/03/2012 14:48, Mladen Turk wrote: > Hi, > > I plan to tag 1.2.34 tomorrow cause we have one regression > and few long lasting bugs fixed. > > I'd appreciate if you can check the httpd builds from trunk > since I concentrated mainly on IIS. > > BTW, should we remove/revoke 1.2.33 or just go