Costin Manolache wrote:
Assuming that most of the pages use 'huge' buffers - you're right.
However, if you have few pages that need large buffers - and most
don't - this will help.
And you would pay the price of System.arraycopy on the bad pages - i.e. normal
pages will be faster, and jsps that
On 12/19/05, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Costin Manolache wrote:
> > One of the problems is that jasper is a tricky piece of code, and
> > usually reducing memory this way can have unexpected impact. Maybe a
> > more 'moderate' approach would be more acceptable, like checking the
>
Costin Manolache wrote:
One of the problems is that jasper is a tricky piece of code, and
usually reducing memory this way can have unexpected impact. Maybe a
more 'moderate' approach would be more acceptable, like checking the
size of the buffers, and only reset it if it is indeed 'huge'. This
w
Tino Schwarze wrote:
Hi Costin,
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 10:01:08AM -0800, Costin Manolache wrote:
One of the problems is that jasper is a tricky piece of code, and
usually reducing memory this way can have unexpected impact. Maybe a
more 'moderate' approach would be more acceptable, like chec
Hi Costin,
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 10:01:08AM -0800, Costin Manolache wrote:
> One of the problems is that jasper is a tricky piece of code, and
> usually reducing memory this way can have unexpected impact. Maybe a
> more 'moderate' approach would be more acceptable, like checking the
> size of
One of the problems is that jasper is a tricky piece of code, and
usually reducing memory this way can have unexpected impact. Maybe a
more 'moderate' approach would be more acceptable, like checking the
size of the buffers, and only reset it if it is indeed 'huge'. This
would take care of the wors
-
From: Tino Schwarze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 December 2005 16:59
To: dev@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Improving memory efficiency
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 05:02:39PM +0100, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> >What do you think about this issue?
>
> It's a fine solution for your &qu
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 05:02:39PM +0100, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> >What do you think about this issue?
>
> It's a fine solution for your "problem", I suppose. Thanks for the
> patch, but we are not going to use it.
So could you please give me a hint, why you are not going to use it? My
"problem
Tino Schwarze wrote:
What do you think about this issue?
It's a fine solution for your "problem", I suppose. Thanks for the
patch, but we are not going to use it.
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additio
