Re: Future of mod_jk jni worker

2006-09-17 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
On Sun, 2006-09-17 at 21:19 +0200, Peter Rossbach wrote: > Have you really test it at unix? No, I just added support for the package to build it. So if someone else wanted to use or test they could and etc. > It works only with a full multithreaded one process mpm! > > JNI means: start tomcat in

Re: Future of mod_jk jni worker

2006-09-17 Thread Peter Rossbach
Have you really test it at unix? It works only with a full multithreaded one process mpm! JNI means: start tomcat inside an apache process. My last successfull test works with tomcat 5.0.22 and apache 2.0.xx (can't remember, Sorry), windows xp, java 1.4.2.xx. I think nobody really use it or

Re: Future of mod_jk jni worker

2006-09-17 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
On Sun, 2006-09-17 at 20:08 +0200, Rainer Jung wrote: > Hi William, > > which mod_jk version is this based on? 1.2.18, using JK 1.2.18 Source Release tomcat-connectors-1.2.18-src.tar.gz > Where can I have a look at the code? In the svn repository for the mod_jk code. Unless you are referring th

Re: Future of mod_jk jni worker

2006-09-17 Thread Bill Barker
"Rainer Jung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hi, > > there is some information, that the JNI worker in mod_jk does not really > work (since a long time). So it looks like it is not being maintained > any more. > It works (or at least it used to), but only with TC 3

Re: Future of mod_jk jni worker

2006-09-17 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi William, which mod_jk version is this based on? Where can I have a look at the code? Regards, Rainer William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: Your timing is perfect, not. I just added code to the mod_jk ebuild on Gentoo to build and install the JNI stuff, yesterday. :( Although no one requested it,

Re: Future of mod_jk jni worker

2006-09-17 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
Your timing is perfect, not. I just added code to the mod_jk ebuild on Gentoo to build and install the JNI stuff, yesterday. :( Although no one requested it, and not sure if anyone ever will use it. Seems there was a name change there recently as well? jni_connect.so is now jk_jnicb.so or so it se