"Rainer Jung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hi, > > there is some information, that the JNI worker in mod_jk does not really > work (since a long time). So it looks like it is not being maintained > any more. >
It works (or at least it used to), but only with TC 3.3.x. And it hasn't been maintained in a very long time. > I would like to clarify things for future mod_jk releases: > > - is there any information, that the JNI worker is still usable (for > which mod_jk release)? > - if there is no such information: are there any objections against > removing it from trunk and documenting, that it's not working any more? > No objection from me. > For example: our default configuration contains about 80% lines, which > are useless when not using JNI. There are also a lot of configuration > options parsed in jk_util.c which are obsolete, once the jni worker gets > dropped. > > Any comments welcome! > > Regards, > > Rainer --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
