Re: Fixing bug 55365

2013-08-07 Thread Mark Thomas
On 07/08/2013 12:11, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > From r1511217 I think you have already figured this. I hadn't figured out the classcache was the root cause but I had figured out the fix. It does mean a very small performance hit but I'm not concerned about that at this point as this is web appli

Re: Fixing bug 55365

2013-08-07 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2013/8/6 Mark Thomas : > Rainer (or anyone else that can figure this out), > > I am in the process of fixing [1] and find myself having to revert some > of one of your commits [2]. My concern is that I can't figure out what > problem [2] was meant to solve and how it solves it. > > The problem is t

Re: Fixing bug 55365

2013-08-07 Thread Mark Thomas
On 07/08/2013 08:43, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 07/08/2013 08:02, Rainer Jung wrote: >> On 07.08.2013 00:26, Rainer Jung wrote: >>> For completeness I checked out r932968 and am now running the TCK under >>> security manager. I'll report the original failures that the patch >>> should have fixed later

Re: Fixing bug 55365

2013-08-06 Thread Mark Thomas
On 07/08/2013 08:02, Rainer Jung wrote: > On 07.08.2013 00:26, Rainer Jung wrote: >> For completeness I checked out r932968 and am now running the TCK under >> security manager. I'll report the original failures that the patch >> should have fixed later on Wednesday. > > Indeed I get lots of failu

Re: Fixing bug 55365

2013-08-06 Thread Rainer Jung
On 07.08.2013 00:26, Rainer Jung wrote: > For completeness I checked out r932968 and am now running the TCK under > security manager. I'll report the original failures that the patch > should have fixed later on Wednesday. Indeed I get lots of failures in the servlet TCK (JSP and EL are OK) with r

Re: Fixing bug 55365

2013-08-06 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi Mark, On 06.08.2013 21:52, Mark Thomas wrote: > Rainer (or anyone else that can figure this out), > > I am in the process of fixing [1] and find myself having to revert some > of one of your commits [2]. My concern is that I can't figure out what > problem [2] was meant to solve and how it sol