William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Bugzilla keywords we added for httpd include PatchAvailable (and FAQ and
a few other obvious ones). At httpd, we encourage people to mark the bug
as PatchAvailable as soon as the patch is apparently worth applying. This
provides a quick search for committers who are
Mark Thomas wrote:
Thank you. Help closing bugs is always much appreciated.
Thank you too.
- security bugs (handled on a private list)
- regressions
- things I (or my employer*) care about
- oldest open 5.5.x or 6.0.x bug without a patch
- enhancements
* This only applies during work hours :
Uwe Günther wrote:
> So I wasn't so wrong with the first one. Unfortunately there was nothing
> to code at all.
>
> So I am gonna go for some odd ones and go on with the good things to do.
>
> How does this work for non commiters; if they have a patch? Ok, 1st
> attach the patch to the bug, 2nd..
Uwe Günther wrote:
> So I wasn't so wrong with the first one. Unfortunately there was nothing
> to code at all.
>
> So I am gonna go for some odd ones and go on with the good things to do.
>
> How does this work for non commiters; if they have a patch? Ok, 1st
> attach the patch to the bug, 2nd..
So I wasn't so wrong with the first one. Unfortunately there was nothing
to code at all.
So I am gonna go for some odd ones and go on with the good things to do.
How does this work for non commiters; if they have a patch? Ok, 1st
attach the patch to the bug, 2nd...?
--
Kind Regards
Uwe Günth
Uwe Günther wrote:
> So I could set this one to resolved! Thanks Tim.
Thank you. Help closing bugs is always much appreciated.
> Some other questions are popping up in my head right now:
>
> - How do you guys to choose which bugs to fix first?
As we say at the ASF - you scratch you own itch. We
It differs by the person. So here is a wild guess ..
But I would guess bugs are usually fixed 1st by interest. For example:
Crap that bug affects my stuff too, I should look at that.
Other bugs are fixed by how interesting they. For example: hmmm .. that
seems odd - I think I'll look at that.
So I could set this one to resolved! Thanks Tim.
Some other questions are popping up in my head right now:
- How do you guys to choose which bugs to fix first?
OK there are priorities, you are able to fix some bugs,
others are more difficult to you, some are security
relevant,
- If
Anyone can change a bug to any status. (Much like in wikipedia - anyone
can edit any page) Then the community would police people who dont
behave. Which doesn't happen often.
-Tim
Uwe Günther wrote:
How does this work, if someone identifies a bug as NO BUG, does somebody
set the status to "Re
