Re: [taglibs] Tab police

2010-11-17 Thread sebb
On 17 November 2010 07:07, Jeremy Boynes wrote: > For a one-time reformat I'd probably go with the one in IDEA followed by > manual review for where it messed up line breaks etc. > > For ongoing checks, we could add a checkstyle report to the build using the > same ruleset as Tomcat (or a strict

Re: [taglibs] Tab police

2010-11-17 Thread sebb
On 17 November 2010 03:45, Rex Wang wrote: > What's the formatter you plan to use? Is it public and other committer > obeyed? Otherwise, it will mess up again in future.. > > Anyway, +1 for tab replacement with 4 spaces. The current code asumes tabs consume 8 spaces, at least in the example code

Re: [taglibs] Tab police

2010-11-16 Thread Jeremy Boynes
For a one-time reformat I'd probably go with the one in IDEA followed by manual review for where it messed up line breaks etc. For ongoing checks, we could add a checkstyle report to the build using the same ruleset as Tomcat (or a stricter subset if desired). The results would look something l

Re: [taglibs] Tab police

2010-11-16 Thread Henri Yandell
+1 for reformatting. I've lived with the terrible code style in taglibs for years because I felt that reformatting it just for me was over the top. Now there are more eyes on the code; PLEASE MAKE IT READABLE! :) I'm assuming it's a one-time only reformat to get us onto something sane. Hen On T

Re: [taglibs] Tab police

2010-11-16 Thread Rex Wang
What's the formatter you plan to use? Is it public and other committer obeyed? Otherwise, it will mess up again in future.. Anyway, +1 for tab replacement with 4 spaces. -Rex 2010/11/16 Jeremy Boynes > As well as the tabs, there are broader inconsistencies in the style (e.g. > consistent brace

Re: [taglibs] Tab police

2010-11-16 Thread sebb
On 16 November 2010 15:38, Jeremy Boynes wrote: > As well as the tabs, there are broader inconsistencies in the style (e.g. > consistent braces, missing javadoc, and the like) that lead to IDE warnings. > > How about running everything through a re-formatter to clean this up? > Downside is that