On 2/28/2011 12:00 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 28/02/2011 18:45, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
On 2/28/2011 11:30 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 28/02/2011 18:11, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
[X] Broken - do not release
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1075030&view=rev
http://svn.apache.org/viewv
On 28/02/2011 18:45, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> On 2/28/2011 11:30 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 28/02/2011 18:11, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
>>> [X] Broken - do not release
>>>
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1075030&view=rev
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1074675&view=rev
>>>
On 2/28/2011 11:30 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 28/02/2011 18:11, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
[X] Broken - do not release
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1075030&view=rev
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1074675&view=rev
Are not completely correct implementations as they don't
- support a tim
On 28/02/2011 18:11, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> [X] Broken - do not release
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1075030&view=rev
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1074675&view=rev
>
> Are not completely correct implementations as they don't
> - support a timeout correctly
That is an issue
[X] Broken - do not release
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1075030&view=rev
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1074675&view=rev
Are not completely correct implementations as they don't
- support a timeout correctly
- dont account for when a write is needed on the selector
- they potentially garb