On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 21:52 +0200, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> > I have no foreseeable solution to building that jar on Gentoo at this
> > time. I have discussed it extensively with others, and we are likely to
> > have to do some package specific hacks or etc to build t
William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
I have no foreseeable solution to building that jar on Gentoo at this
time. I have discussed it extensively with others, and we are likely to
have to do some package specific hacks or etc to build that jar. In the
mean time, those needing that jar are having to fetch
Peter Rossbach wrote:
Hi!
At which tomcat release you want to change it? 6.0
Of course.
You want use the commons-logging 1.1 code base?
No, probably use what is in the sandbox to start with.
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mai
I'm all for it, I don't like it, but it prevents version issues when
users slap add in their own versions, hence it makes tomcat itself more
manageable.
Filip
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
I think Tomcat would be more robust if commons-logging was package
renamed (this is the last commons- whi
On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 11:21 -0400, Yoav Shapira wrote:
> Hi,
> Pure neutral zero on this one, so I guess I'm not being particularly
> helpful. On one hand I hate the renaming thing because it feels like
> an ugly hack and it makes life more difficult for downstream
> packagers.
Please, please, pl
Hi!
At which tomcat release you want to change it? 6.0
That change can be break subclasses or components from other people,
not nice.
Has you talk with Boris and future usage of his x4juli lib?
But I also see your arguments to do that. Hmm!
You want use the commons-logging 1.1 code base?
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
Pure neutral zero on this one, so I guess I'm not being particularly
helpful. On one hand I hate the renaming thing because it feels like
an ugly hack and it makes life more difficult for downstream
packagers. On the other hand, we haven't had any DBCP-related
complaints
Hi,
Pure neutral zero on this one, so I guess I'm not being particularly
helpful. On one hand I hate the renaming thing because it feels like
an ugly hack and it makes life more difficult for downstream
packagers. On the other hand, we haven't had any DBCP-related
complaints (besides the one fro
Hi,
I think Tomcat would be more robust if commons-logging was package
renamed (this is the last commons- which is not package renamed at the
moment, BTW), so I propose doing that.
It would mean integration with alternate loggers in Tomcat is more
difficult (the wrapper would have to be pack
