Hi, Pure neutral zero on this one, so I guess I'm not being particularly helpful. On one hand I hate the renaming thing because it feels like an ugly hack and it makes life more difficult for downstream packagers. On the other hand, we haven't had any DBCP-related complaints (besides the one from the downstream repackager last month) since we started repackaging it, which is nice.
Yoav On 10/4/06, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, I think Tomcat would be more robust if commons-logging was package renamed (this is the last commons- which is not package renamed at the moment, BTW), so I propose doing that. It would mean integration with alternate loggers in Tomcat is more difficult (the wrapper would have to be package renamed too), but OTOH it would avoid classloading issues with the webapp. The implementation which could be used is the one from tomcat-lite (since it's small and robust). It's a bit power/flexibility vs robustness, here. Comments ? Rémy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
