I have finished the third in my series of new unit tests, which examines
the SingleSignOn interactions between the Digest and NonLogin
Authenticators. Because each Authenticator class has its own SSO logic,
I feel it is sensible to test that logic explicitly. However, there is
no need to duplic
On 23/01/2012 06:06, Brian Burch wrote:
> I have now finished the second in my set of new unit test classes. This
> one examines the SingleSignOn interactions between the NonLogin and
> Basic Authenticators.
>
> It is consistent with the various changes made to my previously
> submitted test class
I have now finished the second in my set of new unit test classes. This
one examines the SingleSignOn interactions between the NonLogin and
Basic Authenticators.
It is consistent with the various changes made to my previously
submitted test class,
org.apache.catalina.authenticator.TestNonLogi
On 15/01/12 04:16, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 14/01/2012 08:24, Brian Burch wrote:
I realise everyone will be busy on the 7.0.24 release, so don't let this
distract you - it isn't urgent.
I had to fix a failing unit test so it was no bother.
Thanks very much, Mark.
I've added this to trunk and
On 14/01/2012 08:24, Brian Burch wrote:
> I realise everyone will be busy on the 7.0.24 release, so don't let this
> distract you - it isn't urgent.
I had to fix a failing unit test so it was no bother.
I've added this to trunk and will port it to 7.0.x once I have taken a
closer look at it. The
I realise everyone will be busy on the 7.0.24 release, so don't let this
distract you - it isn't urgent.
Before I started developing my unit tests for SSO, I wrote a test class
for NonLoginAuthenticator and BasicAuthenticator. This test class checks
the behaviour of both authenticators when th
