On 15/01/12 04:16, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 14/01/2012 08:24, Brian Burch wrote:
I realise everyone will be busy on the 7.0.24 release, so don't let this
distract you - it isn't urgent.

I had to fix a failing unit test so it was no bother.

Thanks very much, Mark.

I've added this to trunk and will port it to 7.0.x once I have taken a
closer look at it. The only change so far is to remove the author tag
which we no longer add in Tomcat. You'll get full credit in the commit
messages and the change log.

It wasn't my ego that made me put it there! I used one of the older tests as my template and tried to follow the style... this class doesn't look much like any junit test I've written before, but I believe maintaining project style is very important. Once a new test class works in the trunk, it will be most likely only looked at by people who are either fixing a new bug, or trying to understand an existing contract.

The only aspect that leaves me feeling slightly uncomfortable is my use of session timeouts. The main point of the SSO tests (as well as confirming obvious behaviour, of course), is to verify that SSO sessions time out properly. I did this by modelling the "real world", using http status codes and short timeouts, but making them long enough for the tomcat background thread to reliably clean them out (i.e. trigger listener methods) when expected.

I resisted the temptation to..
a) reconfigure the background thread to scan for expired sessions more frequently,
and b) write a test-only event listener to confirm session expiry.

My decision was to make the tests easily understandable by people who don't have much internals knowledge. Also, the authenticators are responsible for setting and returning the error status codes and I didn't like the idea of skipping that logic.

The price is a few extra 5-10 second sleeps, but I felt this was negligible compared to starting and stopping tomcat hundreds (thousands?) of times in a full test run.

Do you approve of my design decision?

I will wait a couple of days in case you have any detailed observations (and changes). Then I'll make the next SSO-enabled test look consistent and submit it.

Brian

Mark

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to